These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30375882)

  • 1. Object recognition and location: Which component of object location memory for landmarks is affected by gender? Evidence from four to ten year-old children.
    Bocchi A; Palermo L; Boccia M; Palmiero M; D'Amico S; Piccardi L
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2020; 9(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30375882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Egocentric cues influence the allocentric spatial memory of object configurations for memory-guided actions.
    Forster PP; Fiehler K; Karimpur H
    J Neurophysiol; 2023 Nov; 130(5):1142-1149. PubMed ID: 37791381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The expression of allocentric object-place recognition memory during development.
    Contreras MP; Born J; Inostroza M
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 372():112013. PubMed ID: 31173799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coding Locations Relative to One or Many Landmarks in Childhood.
    Negen J; Bou Ali L; Chere B; Roome HE; Park Y; Nardini M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 15(10):e1007380. PubMed ID: 31658253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for age-related deficits in object-location binding during place recognition.
    Muffato V; Hilton C; Meneghetti C; De Beni R; Wiener JM
    Hippocampus; 2019 Oct; 29(10):971-979. PubMed ID: 31070289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of age in women in visuo-spatial memory in reaching and navigation tasks with and without landmarks.
    Perrochon A; Mandigout S; Petruzzellis S; Soria Garcia N; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Daviet JC
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 684():13-17. PubMed ID: 29966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-Year-Olds Use a Mixture of Spatial Reference Frames.
    Negen J; Nardini M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131984. PubMed ID: 26133990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex, diurnal variation and retention interval differently affect performance of marmoset monkeys in a recognition memory task for object location.
    Vannuchi CRS; Costa CS; de Jesus FM; Maior RS; Barros M
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 379():112334. PubMed ID: 31697981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Emotional Landmarks on Topographical Memory.
    Palmiero M; Piccardi L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():763. PubMed ID: 28539910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective sexual orientation-related differences in object location memory.
    Hassan B; Rahman Q
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 121(3):625-33. PubMed ID: 17592955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allocentric versus egocentric representation of remembered reach targets in human cortex.
    Chen Y; Monaco S; Byrne P; Yan X; Henriques DY; Crawford JD
    J Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 34(37):12515-26. PubMed ID: 25209289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memory for object location: a span study in children.
    Cestari V; Lucidi A; Pieroni L; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Mar; 61(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 17479738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of macroreference frames in spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Siegel ZD; Sjolund LA; Avraamides MN
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1278-1286. PubMed ID: 29931620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender differences in the development of semantic and spatial processing of numbers.
    Zhang T; Chen C; Chen C; Wei W
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2020 Sep; 38(3):391-414. PubMed ID: 32212402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations from childhood to elderly age.
    Ruggiero G; D'Errico O; Iachini T
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 25805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of memory for spatial locations and object/place associations in infant rhesus macaques with and without neonatal hippocampal lesions.
    Blue SN; Kazama AM; Bachevalier J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2013 Nov; 19(10):1053-64. PubMed ID: 23880255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
    Byrne PA; Crawford JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential Representation of Landmark and Self-Motion Information along the CA1 Radial Axis: Self-Motion Generated Place Fields Shift toward Landmarks during Septal Inactivation.
    Fattahi M; Sharif F; Geiller T; Royer S
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 38(30):6766-6778. PubMed ID: 29954846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal dynamics of object location processing in allocentric reference frame.
    Török Á; Kóbor A; Persa G; Galambos P; Baranyi P; Csépe V; Honbolygó F
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Sep; 54(9):1346-1358. PubMed ID: 28480967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.