112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3037640)
1. [Imaging diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with computerized tomography and sonography].
Hamm B; Albig M; Römer T; Felix R; Wolf KJ
Rofo; 1987 Jun; 146(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 3037640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Computerized tomography and MR tomography in diagnosis of ovarian tumors].
Hamm B
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):362-9. PubMed ID: 7938483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ovarian lymphoma. Findings with ultrasonography, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance].
Ferrozzi F; Catanese C; Uccelli M; Bassi P
Radiol Med; 1998 May; 95(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 9687927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Computerized tomography (CT) and nuclear magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) in the diagnosis of liver metastasis].
Imhof H; Tscholakoff D; Neuhold A; Wicke L
Acta Med Austriaca; 1986; 13(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 3577631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of ovarian cancer.
Fischerova D; Burgetova A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):697-720. PubMed ID: 24846098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [MRT diagnosis of recurrence of gynecologic tumors].
Lorenzen M; Nicolas V; Kopp A
Rofo; 1994 Dec; 161(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 7803776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of echography and x-ray computed tomography in cancer of the ovary].
Normand F; Bruneton JN; Vigne E; Balu-Maestro C; Ettore F; Frenay M
Bull Cancer; 1988; 75(9):889-93. PubMed ID: 3061501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Kurtz AB; Tsimikas JV; Tempany CM; Hamper UM; Arger PH; Bree RL; Wechsler RJ; Francis IR; Kuhlman JE; Siegelman ES; Mitchell DG; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Sheth S; Coleman BG; Ellis JH; Kurman RJ; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10405715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Nuclear magnetic resonance tomographic staging of tumors of the oral cavity, oro- and hypopharynx and the larynx. A comparison with computed tomography and sonography].
Gademann G; Haels J; König R; Mende U; Lennarz T; Kober B; van Kaick G
Rofo; 1986 Nov; 145(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 3024244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology.
Castellucci P; Perrone AM; Picchio M; Ghi T; Farsad M; Nanni C; Messa C; Meriggiola MC; Pelusi G; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D; Fazio F; Fanti S
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Aug; 28(8):589-95. PubMed ID: 17625380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, digital angiography, and computerized tomography with lipiodol].
Bartolozzi C; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Gibilisco G; Cioni R; Vignali C
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 7997616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of imaging procedures in the diagnosis and staging of bladder tumors].
Nicolas V; Harder T; Steudel A; Krahe T; Schindler G; van Ahlen H; Jaeger N
Rofo; 1988 Mar; 148(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 2832883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetic resonance tomography of focal liver lesions in comparison with computed tomography and sonography].
Hamm B; Römer T; Friedrich M; Felix R; Wolf KJ
Rofo; 1986 Mar; 144(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 3008228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
Suzuki M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic and interventional radiology in gynecologic neoplasms.
Thorvinger B
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1992; 378 ( Pt 3)():93-108. PubMed ID: 1323200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of imaging procedures in tumors of the adnexa].
Terinde R
Gynakologe; 1986 Sep; 19(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 3533729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy.
Amendola MA
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985; 24(4):329-68. PubMed ID: 3896652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance tomography of ovarian tumors].
Hamm B; Römer T; Albig M; Felix R; Wolf KJ
Rofo; 1987 Apr; 146(4):429-38. PubMed ID: 3033768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings.
Rieber A; Nüssle K; Stöhr I; Grab D; Fenchel S; Kreienberg R; Reske SN; Brambs HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 11418411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of tumor recurrence in patients with carcinoma of the ovaries.
Kainz C; Prayer L; Gitsch G; Stiglbauer R; Kramer J; Reinthaller A; Kölbl H
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Mar; 178(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 8149015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
