111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3037640)
21. [Imaging procedures in diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma].
Häusler G; Schurz B
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1996; 146(1-2):8-10. PubMed ID: 8835488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) and computed tomography (CT) of bronchial carcinoma. Comparison of the value of both study methods for preoperative staging].
König R; Gademann G; van Kaick G; Zabel J; Lorenz WJ; Vogt-Moykopf I
Rofo; 1986 Apr; 144(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 3008247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Possibilities and limitations of radiology--CT and MRT in cases of tumors of the uterus and ovary].
Köster O
Rontgenblatter; 1990 Oct; 43(10):413-9. PubMed ID: 2247760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The special role of ultrasound for screening, staging and surveillance of malignant ovarian tumors: distinction from other methods of diagnostic imaging.
Manegold-Brauer G; Bellin AK; Tercanli S; Lapaire O; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Mar; 289(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 24253338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of the results of preoperative studies with imaging procedures with the surgical status of ovarian cancer].
Simon WE; Lenz M; Storz A; Straussinsky G; Hirsch HA
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jun; 49(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 2663620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography and computed tomography in the tumor staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas].
Steinkamp HJ; Heim T; Mäurer J; Mathe F; Felix R
Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 8490152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The diagnosis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of ovarian carcinoma].
Mizuno K
Rinsho Byori; 1992 Feb; 40(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 1583787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of computerized tomography and B-image ultrasound in imaging diagnosis of the mediastinum].
Betsch B; Berndt R; Knopp MV; Schmähl A; Trost U; Delorme S
Bildgebung; 1994 Dec; 61(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 7849472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adnexal masses: MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US and CT correlation.
Mitchell DG; Mintz MC; Spritzer CE; Gussman D; Arger PH; Coleman BG; Axel L; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 3541026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A multidisciplinary approach to ovarian cancer at diagnosis.
Spencer JA
Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 2():S94-102. PubMed ID: 16306641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [The magnetic resonance tomography of intracranial ependymomas. Their clinical appearance and comparison with computed tomography].
Neumann K; Schörner W; Hosten N; Iglesias JR; Böck JC
Rofo; 1992 Aug; 157(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 1515617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The accuracy of the imaging procedures (sonography, MRT, CT, angio-CT,nuclear medicine) in characterizing liver tumors].
Lüning M; Koch M; Abet L; Wolff H; Wenig B; Buchali K; Schöpke W; Schneider T; Mühler A; Rudolph B
Rofo; 1991 Apr; 154(4):398-406. PubMed ID: 1850156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) of the orbit].
Krahe T; Gieseke J; Herter M; Trier HG; Wolf HH; Lackner K
Rofo; 1987 Mar; 146(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 3031755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A critical evaluation of transvaginal Doppler studies, transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and CA 125 in detecting ovarian cancer.
Hata K; Hata T; Manabe A; Sugimura K; Kitao M
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):922-6. PubMed ID: 1448260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Current update on borderline ovarian neoplasms.
Lalwani N; Shanbhogue AK; Vikram R; Nagar A; Jagirdar J; Prasad SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):330-6. PubMed ID: 20093592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Imaging superficial skin tumors of the ENT area. High frequency ultrasound in comparison with computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography].
Heinritz H; Benzel W; Hoffmann K; Iro H
HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 7890552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Endoral sonography in comparison with transcutaneous sonography, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography].
Nitsche N; Waitz G; Iro H
HNO; 1991 Jul; 39(7):247-53. PubMed ID: 1938488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of primary gynecologic malignancies: comparison of 0.15-T resistive MRI with CT.
Bies JR; Ellis JH; Kopecky KK; Sutton GP; Klatte EC; Stehman FB; Ehrlich CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1249-57. PubMed ID: 6333795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Transvaginal ultrasonography and nuclear magnetic resonance. Comparison of techniques in the evaluation of ovarian lesions].
Mascaretti G; Carta G; Renzi E; Peluzzi C; Bonitatibus A; Di Francesco CL; Patacchiola F; Moscarini M
Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Nov; 46(11):591-5. PubMed ID: 7854561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The value of MRI in staging gynecologic tumors].
Lorenzen M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Mar; 6(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8679726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
