162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30376891)
1. Reliability and validity of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS).
Thielsch MT; Wetterkamp M; Boertz P; Gosheger G; Schulte TL
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 13(1):274. PubMed ID: 30376891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. German validation of the quality of life profile for spinal disorders (QLPSD).
Schulte TL; Thielsch MT; Gosheger G; Boertz P; Terheyden JH; Wetterkamp M
Eur Spine J; 2018 Jan; 27(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 28889338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments.
Matamalas A; Bagó J; D'Agata E; Pellisé F
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Jun; 12():81. PubMed ID: 24894714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A validation study on the traditional Chinese version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Guo J; Lau AH; Chau J; Ng BK; Lee KM; Qiu Y; Cheng JC; Lam TP
Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3186-3193. PubMed ID: 27167743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. German validation of the BIDQ-S questionnaire on body image disturbance in idiopathic scoliosis.
Wetterkamp M; Thielsch MT; Gosheger G; Boertz P; Terheyden JH; Schulte TL
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):309-315. PubMed ID: 27909807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spinal appearance questionnaire: factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing.
Carreon LY; Sanders JO; Polly DW; Sucato DJ; Parent S; Roy-Beaudry M; Hopkins J; McClung A; Bratcher KR; Diamond BE;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(18):E1240-4. PubMed ID: 21343853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Korean version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire.
Lee JS; Shin JK; Goh TS; Son SM; An SJ
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 30(6):1203-1208. PubMed ID: 28655125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Sanders JO; Harrast JJ; Kuklo TR; Polly DW; Bridwell KH; Diab M; Dormans JP; Drummond DS; Emans JB; Johnston CE; Lenke LG; McCarthy RE; Newton PO; Richards BS; Sucato DJ;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2719-22. PubMed ID: 18007251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of reliability and validity of the adapted Persian version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
Babaee T; Moradi V; Rouhani N; Shariat A; Parent-Nichols J; Safarnejad H; Nakhaee M
Spine Deform; 2022 Mar; 10(2):317-326. PubMed ID: 34533776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of the adapted Turkish version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire.
Yapar A; Yapar D; Ergisi Y; Kaptan AY; Tokgoz MA; Senkoylu A
Spine Deform; 2021 Jan; 9(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 32808197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Greek version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Oikonomaki M; Kelalis G; Skouras AZ; Sotiropoulos S; Georgoudis G; Grivas T
Spine Deform; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38833190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation.
Wei X; Zhu X; Bai Y; Wu D; Chen J; Wang C; Chen Z; Yang C; Li J; Li M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):1497-504. PubMed ID: 22089401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Dutch version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: patient-based cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties evaluation.
van de Fliert DG; Schlösser TPC; Kempen DHR; Rutges JPHJ; Bisseling P; de Kleuver M; van Hooff ML
Spine Deform; 2024 Jan; 12(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 37563437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Korean Version of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis.
Bae SH; Son SM; Shin WC; Goh TS; Lee JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(10):E582-E586. PubMed ID: 31770342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of a one-item drawing-based instrument to assess trunk deformity perception in kyphotic deformities.
Sanchez-Raya J; Matamalas A; Figueras C; Bago J
Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 32638334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Responsiveness of Image Perception Outcome Scales After Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison Between the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Questionnaire.
Bago J; Matamalas A; Sánchez-Raya J; Pellise F; Pérez-Grueso FJS
Spine Deform; 2018; 6(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29886913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.
Matamalas A; Bagó J; D Agata E; Pellisé F
Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3170-3179. PubMed ID: 26975856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the spinal appearance questionnaire for congenital scoliosis patients over 10 years old.
Fanid MA; Yapar D; Yapar A; Daldal İ; Çetinkaya M; Şenköylü A
Spine Deform; 2021 Nov; 9(6):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 33948921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis.
Bao H; Yan P; Lonner B; Qiu Y; Ren Y; Zhu Z; Liu Z; Zhu F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(21):E1155-60. PubMed ID: 26502102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-evaluation of Trunk Aesthetics in Conservatively Treated Children and Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Lendzion M; Łukaszewicz E; Waś J; Czaprowski D
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 20(5):371-382. PubMed ID: 30648659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
