These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30377603)

  • 1. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver reliability of the AO classification for wrist fractures.
    Tenório PHM; Vieira MM; Alberti A; Abreu MFM; Nakamoto JC; Cliquet A
    Rev Bras Ortop; 2018; 53(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 30377603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the old and new classifications of toracolombar fractures.
    Lopes FAR; Ferreira APRB; Santos RAAD; Maçaneiro CH
    Rev Bras Ortop; 2018; 53(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 30258823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.
    Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures.
    Masionis P; Uvarovas V; Mazarevičius G; Popov K; Venckus Š; Baužys K; Porvaneckas N
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 30639032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability Evaluation of the New AO Spine-DGOU Classification for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures.
    Quinteros G; Cabrera JP; Urrutia J; Carazzo CA; Guiroy A; Marré B; Joaquim A; Yurac R
    World Neurosurg; 2022 May; 161():e436-e440. PubMed ID: 35158101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
    Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study.
    Besa P; Angulo M; Vial R; Vega R; Irribarra L; Lobos D; Sandoval F; Irarrázaval S
    Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110741. PubMed ID: 38143118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreements of the New AO/OTA Classification for Fractures of the Trochanteric Region and the Femoral Neck.
    Busato TS; Baldasso D; Matioski Filho GR; Godoi LD; Morozowski MG; Capriotti JRV
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Apr; 57(2):241-249. PubMed ID: 35652025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of available classification systems.
    Kuhn MZ; King JJ; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Levy JC; Hao KA; Wallace A; Patrick M
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2034-2042. PubMed ID: 35562034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification.
    Carula BC; Giostri GS; Bebber F; Batista MFDS; Silva FBD; Novak EM
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Dec; 57(6):917-923. PubMed ID: 36540737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography use on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of pilon fracture classification and treatment recommendation.
    Byun SE; Choi W; Choi Y; Ahn TK; Kim HK; Yoon S; Lee J; Choi DS
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1407-1412. PubMed ID: 31542310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of three classification systems for lateral clavicle fractures - reliability comparison between two specialist groups.
    Rauer T; Boos M; Neuhaus V; Ellanti P; Kaufmann RA; Pape HC; Allemann F
    Patient Saf Surg; 2020; 14():4. PubMed ID: 31911821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra and interobserver concordance of the AO classification system for fractures of the long bones in the pediatric population.
    Utino AY; de Alencar DR; Fernadez Maringolo L; Negrão JM; Blumetti FC; Dobashi ET
    Rev Bras Ortop; 2015; 50(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 26535194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.