BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30380315)

  • 1. EEG in neonates: Forward modeling and sensitivity analysis with respect to variations of the conductivity.
    Azizollahi H; Darbas M; Diallo MM; Badia AE; Lohrengel S
    Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):905-932. PubMed ID: 30380315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of fontanel on scalp EEG potentials in the neonate.
    Gargiulo P; Belfiore P; Friðgeirsson EA; Vanhatalo S; Ramon C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Sep; 126(9):1703-10. PubMed ID: 25553851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.
    Lew S; Sliva DD; Choe MS; Grant PE; Okada Y; Wolters CH; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():282-93. PubMed ID: 23531680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of unfused cranial bones on magnetoencephalography signals in human infants.
    Lew S; Hämäläinen MS; Ahlfors SP; Okada Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Mar; 132(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 33571879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of local skull inhomogeneities on EEG source estimation.
    Ollikainen JO; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    Med Eng Phys; 1999 Apr; 21(3):143-54. PubMed ID: 10468356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The inhomogeneous conductivity property of cranial tissues and its representation in numerical head models.
    Wen P; He F; Sammut K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Sep; 22(3):92-8. PubMed ID: 10816766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG.
    Pursiainen S; Lew S; Wolters CH
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):876-884. PubMed ID: 27852731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the effects of head modelling errors and measurement noise on EEG source localization accuracy in preterm newborns: A single-subject study.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Kazemi K; Wallois F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 58(3):2746-2765. PubMed ID: 37448164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of structural complexities in head modeling on the accuracy of EEG source localization in neonates.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(5):056004. PubMed ID: 32942266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Handling anisotropic conductivities in the EEG forward problem with a symmetric formulation.
    Pillain A; Rahmouni L; Andriulli F
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(3):035022. PubMed ID: 30577034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for anisotropic inhomogeneous head tissue conductivity in human head modelling.
    Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 33(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20502999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-layer-isotropic skull conductivity representation in the EEG forward problem using spherical head models.
    Cuartas-Morales E; Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Castellanos-Dominguez G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4904-7. PubMed ID: 25571091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
    Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the distortion of EEG signals caused by a hole in the skull mimicking the fontanel in the skull of human neonates.
    Flemming L; Wang Y; Caprihan A; Eiselt M; Haueisen J; Okada Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 116(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15826855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.