185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30380315)
21. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationship of EEG sources of neonatal seizures to acute perinatal brain lesions seen on MRI: a pilot study.
Despotovic I; Cherian PJ; De Vos M; Hallez H; Deburchgraeve W; Govaert P; Lequin M; Visser GH; Swarte RM; Vansteenkiste E; Van Huffel S; Philips W
Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Oct; 34(10):2402-17. PubMed ID: 22522744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
Musha T; Okamoto Y
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models.
Pohlmeier R; Buchner H; Knoll G; Rienäcker A; Beckmann R; Pesch J
Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9104826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of skull sutures, spongiform bone distribution, and aging skull conductivities on the EEG forward and inverse problems.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 34915464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A Finite Element Solution of the Forward Problem in EEG for Multipolar Sources.
Beltrachini L
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Mar; 27(3):368-377. PubMed ID: 30561347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Equivalent dipole source imaging of brain electric activity by means of parametric projection filter.
Hori J; He B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 29(5):436-45. PubMed ID: 11400724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trends in EEG source localization.
Koles ZJ
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Feb; 106(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 9741773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
