555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30380350)
1. Cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab and natalizumab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatment in Iran: decision analysis based on an indirect comparison.
Taheri S; Sahraian MA; Yousefi N
J Med Econ; 2019 Jan; 22(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 30380350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England.
Hettle R; Harty G; Wong SL
J Med Econ; 2018 Jul; 21(7):676-686. PubMed ID: 29618273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-utility analysis of alemtuzumab in comparison with interferon beta, fingolimod, and natalizumab treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria.
Walter E; Berger T; Bajer-Kornek B; Deisenhammer F
J Med Econ; 2019 Mar; 22(3):226-237. PubMed ID: 30522373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States.
Chirikov V; Ma I; Joshi N; Patel D; Smith A; Giambrone C; Cornelio N; Hashemi L
Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 30711061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness of Peginterferon Beta-1a and Alemtuzumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Dashputre AA; Kamal KM; Pawar G
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jun; 23(6):666-676. PubMed ID: 28530523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of escalating to natalizumab or switching among immunomodulators in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy.
Furneri G; Santoni L; Ricella C; Prosperini L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):436. PubMed ID: 31253138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: analyses in Sweden.
O'Day K; Meyer K; Stafkey-Mailey D; Watson C
J Med Econ; 2015 Apr; 18(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 25422991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-minimization analysis of alemtuzumab compared to fingolimod and natalizumab for the treatment of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands.
Piena MA; Heisen M; Wormhoudt LW; Wingerden JV; Frequin STFM; Uitdehaag BMJ
J Med Econ; 2018 Oct; 21(10):968-976. PubMed ID: 29911917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When does economic model type become a decisive factor in health technology appraisals? Learning from the expanding treatment options for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Noon KM; Montgomery SM; Adlard NE; Kroes MA
J Med Econ; 2018 Oct; 21(10):983-992. PubMed ID: 29923439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study in Iran.
Rezaee M; Izadi S; Keshavarz K; Borhanihaghighi A; Ravangard R
J Med Econ; 2019 Apr; 22(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 30561242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
Zimmermann M; Brouwer E; Tice JA; Seidner M; Loos AM; Liu S; Chapman RH; Kumar V; Carlson JJ
CNS Drugs; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 30141001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness of Natalizumab Compared With Fingolimod for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treatment in Colombia.
Lasalvia P; Hernández F; Castañeda-Cardona C; Cuestas JA; Rosselli D
Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 Dec; 23():13-18. PubMed ID: 31999987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for treatment relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Sawad AB; Seoane-Vazquez E; Rodriguez-Monguio R; Turkistani F
J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Mar; 6(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 28118731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A discrete event simulation to model the cost-utility of fingolimod and natalizumab in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.
Montgomery SM; Maruszczak MJ; Slater D; Kusel J; Nicholas R; Adlard N
J Med Econ; 2017 May; 20(5):474-482. PubMed ID: 28008769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and natalizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Earnshaw SR; Graham J; Oleen-Burkey M; Castelli-Haley J; Johnson K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 19731967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study.
Kalincik T; Brown JWL; Robertson N; Willis M; Scolding N; Rice CM; Wilkins A; Pearson O; Ziemssen T; Hutchinson M; McGuigan C; Jokubaitis V; Spelman T; Horakova D; Havrdova E; Trojano M; Izquierdo G; Lugaresi A; Prat A; Girard M; Duquette P; Grammond P; Alroughani R; Pucci E; Sola P; Hupperts R; Lechner-Scott J; Terzi M; Van Pesch V; Rozsa C; Grand'Maison F; Boz C; Granella F; Slee M; Spitaleri D; Olascoaga J; Bergamaschi R; Verheul F; Vucic S; McCombe P; Hodgkinson S; Sanchez-Menoyo JL; Ampapa R; Simo M; Csepany T; Ramo C; Cristiano E; Barnett M; Butzkueven H; Coles A;
Lancet Neurol; 2017 Apr; 16(4):271-281. PubMed ID: 28209331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.
Spelman T; Herring WL; Acosta C; Hyde R; Jokubaitis VG; Pucci E; Lugaresi A; Laureys G; Havrdova EK; Horakova D; Izquierdo G; Eichau S; Ozakbas S; Alroughani R; Kalincik T; Duquette P; Girard M; Petersen T; Patti F; Csepany T; Granella F; Grand'Maison F; Ferraro D; Karabudak R; Jose Sa M; Trojano M; van Pesch V; Van Wijmeersch B; Cartechini E; McCombe P; Gerlach O; Spitaleri D; Rozsa C; Hodgkinson S; Bergamaschi R; Gouider R; Soysal A; Castillo-Triviño ; Prevost J; Garber J; de Gans K; Ampapa R; Simo M; Sanchez-Menoyo JL; Iuliano G; Sas A; van der Walt A; John N; Gray O; Hughes S; De Luca G; Onofrj M; Buzzard K; Skibina O; Terzi M; Slee M; Solaro C; Oreja-Guevara ; Ramo-Tello C; Fragoso Y; Shaygannejad V; Moore F; Rajda C; Aguera Morales E; Butzkueven H
J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):109-125. PubMed ID: 38085684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of alemtuzumab and natalizumab in the treatment of different stages of multiple sclerosis patients.
Wang L; Qi CH; Zhong R; Yuan C; Zhong QY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Feb; 97(8):e9908. PubMed ID: 29465579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Costs and effectiveness of fingolimod versus alemtuzumab in the treatment of highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK: re-treatment, discount, and disutility.
Montgomery SM; Kusel J; Nicholas R; Adlard N
J Med Econ; 2017 Sep; 20(9):962-973. PubMed ID: 28635362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Bozkaya D; Livingston T; Migliaccio-Walle K; Odom T
J Med Econ; 2017 Mar; 20(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 27822961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
