These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30380580)

  • 1. Buccal versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Term Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Dorr ML; Pierson RC; Daggy J; Quinney SK; Haas DM
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jun; 36(7):765-772. PubMed ID: 30380580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.
    Harman Crowell EH; Crowell AM; Theiler RN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 31455215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Wing DA; Park MR; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):905-8. PubMed ID: 10831989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical change times during induction in nulliparas using vaginal or buccal misoprostol.
    Grasch JL; Daggy J; Yang Z; Bhamidipalli SS; Flannery KM; Quinney SK; Haas DM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(26):10685-10691. PubMed ID: 36510345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
    Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Buccal versus intravaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening.
    Carlan SJ; Blust D; O'Brien WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 186(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 11854640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
    Girault A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
    Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oxytocin Compared to Buccal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor after Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes.
    Freret TS; Chacón KM; Bryant AS; Kaimal AJ; Clapp MA
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Feb; 38(3):224-230. PubMed ID: 31491801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.