These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30381376)
1. Reciprocal mimicry: kin selection can drive defended prey to resemble their Batesian mimics. Holen ØH; Johnstone RA Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 285(1890):. PubMed ID: 30381376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mimicry among Unequally Defended Prey Should Be Mutualistic When Predators Sample Optimally. Aubier TG; Joron M; Sherratt TN Am Nat; 2017 Mar; 189(3):267-282. PubMed ID: 28221836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries. Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15266978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State-Dependent Decision-Making by Predators and Its Consequences for Mimicry. Aubier TG; Sherratt TN Am Nat; 2020 Nov; 196(5):E127-E144. PubMed ID: 33064589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of inaccurate mimics. Johnstone RA Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6897):524-6. PubMed ID: 12152077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prey from the eyes of predators: Color discriminability of aposematic and mimetic butterflies from an avian visual perspective. Su S; Lim M; Kunte K Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):2985-94. PubMed ID: 26477885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry. Rowland HM; Mappes J; Ruxton GD; Speed MP Ecol Lett; 2010 Dec; 13(12):1494-502. PubMed ID: 20955507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural selection in mimicry. Anderson B; de Jager ML Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Apr; 95(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 31663254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mapping the evolution of accurate Batesian mimicry of social wasps in hoverflies. Leavey A; Taylor CH; Symonds MRE; Gilbert F; Reader T Evolution; 2021 Nov; 75(11):2802-2815. PubMed ID: 34464452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The evolution of mimicry under constraints. Holen ØH; Johnstone RA Am Nat; 2004 Nov; 164(5):598-613. PubMed ID: 15540150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evasive mimicry: when (if ever) could mimicry based on difficulty of capture evolve? Ruxton GD; Speed M; Sherratt TN Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Oct; 271(1553):2135-42. PubMed ID: 15475333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mimicry in motion and morphology: do information limitation, trade-offs or compensation relax selection for mimetic accuracy? McLean DJ; Herberstein ME Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jun; 288(1952):20210815. PubMed ID: 34102888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why many Batesian mimics are inaccurate: evidence from hoverfly colour patterns. Taylor CH; Reader T; Gilbert F Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1842):. PubMed ID: 28120792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of ultraviolet colour in the assessment of mimetic accuracy between Batesian mimics and their models: a case study using ant-mimicking spiders. Corcobado G; Herberstein ME; Pekár S Naturwissenschaften; 2016 Dec; 103(11-12):90. PubMed ID: 27722878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry. Páez E; Valkonen JK; Willmott KR; Matos-Maraví P; Elias M; Mappes J Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Mar; 288(1946):20203052. PubMed ID: 33715434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]