130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30381630)
1. Proximal contact tightness of class Ⅱ bulk-fill composite resin restorations: An in vitro study.
El-Shamy H; Sonbul H; Alturkestani N; Tashkandi A; Loomans BA; Dörfer C; El-Badrawy W
Dent Mater J; 2019 Feb; 38(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 30381630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of increment thickness on dentin bond strength and light transmission of composite base materials.
Omran TA; Garoushi S; Abdulmajeed AA; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1717-1724. PubMed ID: 27613613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites.
Furness A; Tadros MY; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24480086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of Class II restorations.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters JF; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
J Adhes Dent; 2006 Oct; 8(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 17080878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites.
Fronza BM; Rueggeberg FA; Braga RR; Mogilevych B; Soares LE; Martin AA; Ambrosano G; Giannini M
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1542-51. PubMed ID: 26608118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation.
Fronza BM; Makishi P; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Sumi Y; Tagami J; Giannini M
Braz Oral Res; 2018 Aug; 32():e80. PubMed ID: 30088553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations Made of Different "Low-Shrinkage" Systems.
Shahidi C; Krejci I; Dietschi D
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):273-283. PubMed ID: 28467259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
Rullman I; Patyna M; Janssen B; Willershausen B
Am J Dent; 2017 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Internal Adaptation of Bulk-fill and Increment-fill Resin Composite Materials.
Alqudaihi FS; Cook NB; Diefenderfer KE; Bottino MC; Platt JA
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E32-E44. PubMed ID: 29856698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Internal Adaptation in Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations Using Micro-CT.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 27892836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
