169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30382434)
1. Quality Improvement in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcome Improvement Through Data Review.
Lorimer PD; Motz BM; Boselli DM; Reames MK; Hill JS; Salo JC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 30382434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of NSQIP Database.
Naffouje SA; Salloum RH; Khalaf Z; Salti GI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):2001-2010. PubMed ID: 30927192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Qi W; Zixiang W; Tianwei Z; Shuai F; Sai Z; Gang S; Ming W
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 117(5):957-969. PubMed ID: 29878389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Collins G; Johnson E; Kroshus T; Ganz R; Batts K; Seng J; Nwaneri O; Dunn D
Surg Endosc; 2006 Feb; 20(2):298-301. PubMed ID: 16362469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients.
Sunpaweravong S; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Mahattanobon S; Geater A
Asian J Surg; 2012 Jul; 35(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 22884266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma].
Liu CQ; Xie MR; Guo MF; Sun XH; Wu HR; Sun XX; Xu MQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 54(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 27938582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.
Palanivelu C; Prakash A; Senthilkumar R; Senthilnathan P; Parthasarathi R; Rajan PS; Venkatachlam S
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16798482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence and impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Day RW; Jaroszewski D; Chang YH; Ross HJ; Paripati H; Ashman JB; Rule WG; Harold KL
Dis Esophagus; 2016 Aug; 29(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 25824527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.
Ben-David K; Tuttle R; Kukar M; Rossidis G; Hochwald SN
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3056-62. PubMed ID: 27112585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
