These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30382444)

  • 41. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
    Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
    Margoni F; Brown TR
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
    Miller QC; Call AA; London K
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Biological Evidence Regarding Psychopathy Does Not Affect Mock Jury Sentencing.
    Remmel RJ; Glenn AL; Cox J
    J Pers Disord; 2019 Apr; 33(2):164-184. PubMed ID: 29469661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes.
    Osborn K; Davis JP; Button S; Foster J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Mar; 36(5-6):NP2675-NP2696. PubMed ID: 29629635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
    Maeder EM; Hunt JS
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case.
    Magyarics CL; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Lippert A
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):602-13. PubMed ID: 26237334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Case of Culture: Defendant Gender and Juror Decision-Making.
    Yamamoto S; Maeder EM
    J Interpers Violence; 2017 Oct; 32(20):3090-3110. PubMed ID: 26224719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A trap for the unwary: jury decision making in cases involving the entrapment defense.
    Peters CS; Lampinen JM; Malesky LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Feb; 37(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 22775305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mock-juror evaluations of traditional and ratings-based eyewitness identification evidence.
    Sauer JD; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Aug; 41(4):375-384. PubMed ID: 28191988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Triarchic Model Personality Traits and Their Impact on Mock Juror Perceptions of a White-Collar Criminal Defendant.
    Rulseh A; Edens JF; Cox J
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 27808554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
    Wuensch KL; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.
    Gordon N; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 28881042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.