346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30383163)
1. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners.
Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients.
Warren SE; Noelle Dunbar M; Bosworth C; Agrawal S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):323-337. PubMed ID: 32664814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).
Potts LG; Skinner MW; Litovsky RA; Strube MJ; Kuk F
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):353-73. PubMed ID: 19594084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to Optimally Fit a Hearing Aid for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.
Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 29688963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the audiogram with loudness growth: The complementarity of electric and acoustic hearing in bimodal patients.
Lambriks L; van Hoof M; George E; Devocht E
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0277161. PubMed ID: 37079550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; van Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 136(8):775-81. PubMed ID: 26986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.
van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implant and hearing aid: a new approach to optimizing the fitting in this bimodal situation.
Keilmann AM; Bohnert AM; Gosepath J; Mann WJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 266(12):1879-84. PubMed ID: 19466442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
