These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30383890)
1. Identification and removal of contaminating microbial DNA from PCR reagents: impact on low-biomass microbiome analyses. Stinson LF; Keelan JA; Payne MS Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30383890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces. Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decontamination of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence datasets based on bacterial load assessment by qPCR. Lazarevic V; Gaïa N; Girard M; Schrenzel J BMC Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 16():73. PubMed ID: 27107811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the human placenta delivered at term have a microbiota? Results of cultivation, quantitative real-time PCR, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and metagenomics. Theis KR; Romero R; Winters AD; Greenberg JM; Gomez-Lopez N; Alhousseini A; Bieda J; Maymon E; Pacora P; Fettweis JM; Buck GA; Jefferson KK; Strauss JF; Erez O; Hassan SS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):267.e1-267.e39. PubMed ID: 30832984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different decontamination methods for reagents to detect low concentrations of bacterial 16S DNA by real-time-PCR. Klaschik S; Lehmann LE; Raadts A; Hoeft A; Stuber F Mol Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 22(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 12448878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elimination of "kitome" and "splashome" contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome. Olomu IN; Pena-Cortes LC; Long RA; Vyas A; Krichevskiy O; Luellwitz R; Singh P; Mulks MH BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):157. PubMed ID: 32527226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform. Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of kit, environment, and sampling contamination on the observed microbiome of bovine milk. Dean CJ; Deng Y; Wehri TC; Pena-Mosca F; Ray T; Crooker BA; Godden SM; Caixeta LS; Noyes NR mSystems; 2024 Jun; 9(6):e0115823. PubMed ID: 38785438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How the 'kitome' influences the characterization of bacterial communities in lepidopteran samples with low bacterial biomass. Paniagua Voirol LR; Valsamakis G; Yu M; Johnston PR; Hilker M J Appl Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 130(6):1780-1793. PubMed ID: 33128818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass. Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of an ethidium monoazide-enhanced internally controlled universal 16S rDNA real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates. Patel P; Garson JA; Tettmar KI; Ancliff S; McDonald C; Pitt T; Coelho J; Tedder RS Transfusion; 2012 Jul; 52(7):1423-32. PubMed ID: 22188457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. Dahlberg J; Sun L; Persson Waller K; Östensson K; McGuire M; Agenäs S; Dicksved J PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218257. PubMed ID: 31194836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications. Champlot S; Berthelot C; Pruvost M; Bennett EA; Grange T; Geigl EM PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20927390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tracking down the sources of experimental contamination in microbiome studies. Weiss S; Amir A; Hyde ER; Metcalf JL; Song SJ; Knight R Genome Biol; 2014 Dec; 15(12):564. PubMed ID: 25608874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing Contamination and Diverse Bacterial Loads in 16S rRNA Deep Sequencing of Clinical Samples: Implications of the Law of Small Numbers. Dyrhovden R; Rippin M; Øvrebø KK; Nygaard RM; Ulvestad E; Kommedal Ø mBio; 2021 Jun; 12(3):e0059821. PubMed ID: 34101489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enrichment of Clinically Relevant Organisms in Spontaneous Preterm-Delivered Placentas and Reagent Contamination across All Clinical Groups in a Large Pregnancy Cohort in the United Kingdom. Leon LJ; Doyle R; Diez-Benavente E; Clark TG; Klein N; Stanier P; Moore GE Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Jul; 84(14):. PubMed ID: 29776928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]