123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30383936)
1. Effect of a "Hard Stop" on Elective Labor Inductions and Cesarean Delivery Rate.
Dixon CL; Bhullar A; Romanski P; Carlan S
J Reprod Med; 2016 Sep; 61(9-10):411-415. PubMed ID: 30383936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.
Yamasato K; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
Matern Child Health J; 2015 May; 19(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 25272996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oregon's Hard-Stop Policy Limiting Elective Early-Term Deliveries: Association With Obstetric Procedure Use and Health Outcomes.
Snowden JM; Muoto I; Darney BG; Quigley B; Tomlinson MW; Neilson D; Friedman SA; Rogovoy J; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1389-1396. PubMed ID: 27824748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction.
Hamm RF; McCoy J; Oladuja A; Bogner HR; Elovitz MA; Morales KH; Srinivas SK; Levine LD
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025582. PubMed ID: 33185679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth.
Levine LD; Bogner HR; Hirshberg A; Elovitz MA; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):354.e1-354.e8. PubMed ID: 24184339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based protocol decreases time to vaginal delivery in elective inductions.
Suresh SC; Kucirka L; Chau DB; Hadley M; Sheffield JS
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100294. PubMed ID: 33451623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital.
Reisner DP; Wallin TK; Zingheim RW; Luthy DA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):674.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19376493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section].
Qu ZQ; Ma RM; Xiao H; Tian YQ; Li BL; Liang K; Du MY; Chen Z; Geng L; Yang MH; Tao YP; Zhu B
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):748-753. PubMed ID: 27788742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective induction of labor in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an intervention that modifies the risk of cesarean section.
Bas-Lando M; Srebnik N; Farkash R; Ioscovich A; Samueloff A; Grisaru-Granovsky S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 290(5):905-12. PubMed ID: 24973018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.
Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expectant management of pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction without any evidence of placental dysfunction at term: Comparison with routine labor induction.
Hidaka N; Sato Y; Kido S; Fujita Y; Kato K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jan; 44(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 28892225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term.
Baud D; Rouiller S; Hohlfeld P; Tolsa JF; Vial Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Nov; 26(16):1595-601. PubMed ID: 23581489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of factors affecting vaginal birth after cesarean].
Wu SW; Lu YZ; Wang SS; Dong XJ; Fang JH; He D; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):576-80. PubMed ID: 27561935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor induction process improvement: a patient quality-of-care initiative.
Fisch JM; English D; Pedaline S; Brooks K; Simhan HN
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 19305322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrepancy Between Identification of Early-Term Elective Deliveries by Manual Chart Review and Data Vendor.
Yamasato K; Tsai PS; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
Hawaii J Med Public Health; 2016 Dec; 75(12):367-372. PubMed ID: 27980880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].
He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
Wigton TR; Wolk BM
J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]