BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30383936)

  • 1. Effect of a "Hard Stop" on Elective Labor Inductions and Cesarean Delivery Rate.
    Dixon CL; Bhullar A; Romanski P; Carlan S
    J Reprod Med; 2016 Sep; 61(9-10):411-415. PubMed ID: 30383936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.
    Yamasato K; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
    Matern Child Health J; 2015 May; 19(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 25272996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oregon's Hard-Stop Policy Limiting Elective Early-Term Deliveries: Association With Obstetric Procedure Use and Health Outcomes.
    Snowden JM; Muoto I; Darney BG; Quigley B; Tomlinson MW; Neilson D; Friedman SA; Rogovoy J; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1389-1396. PubMed ID: 27824748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction.
    Hamm RF; McCoy J; Oladuja A; Bogner HR; Elovitz MA; Morales KH; Srinivas SK; Levine LD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025582. PubMed ID: 33185679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth.
    Levine LD; Bogner HR; Hirshberg A; Elovitz MA; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):354.e1-354.e8. PubMed ID: 24184339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based protocol decreases time to vaginal delivery in elective inductions.
    Suresh SC; Kucirka L; Chau DB; Hadley M; Sheffield JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100294. PubMed ID: 33451623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
    Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital.
    Reisner DP; Wallin TK; Zingheim RW; Luthy DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):674.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19376493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section].
    Qu ZQ; Ma RM; Xiao H; Tian YQ; Li BL; Liang K; Du MY; Chen Z; Geng L; Yang MH; Tao YP; Zhu B
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):748-753. PubMed ID: 27788742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction of labor in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an intervention that modifies the risk of cesarean section.
    Bas-Lando M; Srebnik N; Farkash R; Ioscovich A; Samueloff A; Grisaru-Granovsky S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 290(5):905-12. PubMed ID: 24973018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.
    Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectant management of pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction without any evidence of placental dysfunction at term: Comparison with routine labor induction.
    Hidaka N; Sato Y; Kido S; Fujita Y; Kato K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jan; 44(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 28892225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term.
    Baud D; Rouiller S; Hohlfeld P; Tolsa JF; Vial Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Nov; 26(16):1595-601. PubMed ID: 23581489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of factors affecting vaginal birth after cesarean].
    Wu SW; Lu YZ; Wang SS; Dong XJ; Fang JH; He D; Zhang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):576-80. PubMed ID: 27561935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Labor induction process improvement: a patient quality-of-care initiative.
    Fisch JM; English D; Pedaline S; Brooks K; Simhan HN
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 19305322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrepancy Between Identification of Early-Term Elective Deliveries by Manual Chart Review and Data Vendor.
    Yamasato K; Tsai PS; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
    Hawaii J Med Public Health; 2016 Dec; 75(12):367-372. PubMed ID: 27980880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].
    He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
    Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
    Wigton TR; Wolk BM
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.