These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30383936)

  • 21. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
    Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study.
    van Gemund N; Hardeman A; Scherjon SA; Kanhai HH
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 56(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 14530612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Antepartum management protocol. Timing and mode of delivery in gestational diabetes.
    Hod M; Bar J; Peled Y; Fried S; Katz I; Itzhak M; Ashkenazi S; Schindel B; Ben-Rafael Z
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():B113-7. PubMed ID: 9704237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor.
    Vardo JH; Thornburg LL; Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 21366123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Srinivas SK; Small DS; Macheras M; Hsu JY; Caldwell D; Lorch S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):770.e1-770.e9. PubMed ID: 27530491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the effects of age, gestation, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity on labor inductions.
    Wilson BL
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 17760792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Elective induction of labor in nulliparous women : should we stop ?].
    Tremblay-Lemoine PL; Van Linthout C; Emonts P; Kridelka F; Seidel L; Capelle X
    Rev Med Liege; 2020 Oct; 75(10):676-681. PubMed ID: 33030845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
    Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.
    Fowler TT; Schiff J; Applegate MS; Griffith K; Fairbrother GL
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Dec; 33(12):2170-8. PubMed ID: 25489035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
    Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
    Combs CA; Singh NB; Khoury JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 8459954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
    Heinberg EM; Wood RA; Chambers RB
    J Reprod Med; 2002 May; 47(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12063879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early Elective Delivery Disparities between Non-Hispanic Black and White Women after Statewide Policy Implementation.
    Kozhimannil KB; Muoto I; Darney BG; Caughey AB; Snowden JM
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 29273264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study.
    Jonsson M; Cnattingius S; Wikström AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 23157554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.