216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30384109)
1. The preferences of potential stakeholders in psychiatric genomic research regarding consent procedures and information delivery.
Sundby A; Boolsen MW; Burgdorf KS; Ullum H; Hansen TF; Middleton A; Mors O
Eur Psychiatry; 2019 Jan; 55():29-35. PubMed ID: 30384109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research.
Sundby A; Boolsen MW; Burgdorf KS; Ullum H; Hansen TF; Middleton A; Mors O
Am J Med Genet A; 2017 Oct; 173(10):2649-2658. PubMed ID: 28817238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.
Sundby A; Boolsen MW; Burgdorf KS; Ullum H; Hansen TF; Mors O
Hum Genomics; 2018 Mar; 12(1):12. PubMed ID: 29506557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants.
Kostick K; Pereira S; Brannan C; Torgerson L; Lázaro-Muñoz G
Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):345-352. PubMed ID: 31477844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views.
Anderson EE; Newman SB; Matthews AK
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 28949896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics.
Kong C; Efrem M; Campbell M
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 31563871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?
McDonald KE; Conroy NE; Olick RS;
Disabil Health J; 2018 Jul; 11(3):345-350. PubMed ID: 29292211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stakeholders' perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review.
Bak MAR; Ploem MC; Ateşyürek H; Blom MT; Tan HL; Willems DL
Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Apr; 28(4):403-416. PubMed ID: 31527854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogate consent: why do we need it?
Balhara Y
Am J Psychiatry; 2007 Jul; 164(7):1119; author reply 1119-20. PubMed ID: 17606666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From "Informed" to "Engaged" Consent: Risks and Obligations in Consent for Participation in a Health Data Repository.
Bromley E; Mendoza-Graf A; Berry S; Nebeker C; Khodyakov D
J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 48(1):172-182. PubMed ID: 32342789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action.
Bunnik EM; Dondorp WJ; Bredenoord AL; de Wert G; Cornel MC
Eur J Cancer; 2021 May; 148():405-410. PubMed ID: 33784533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing of Chinese psychiatrists' attitudes toward consent process to treatment and its association with the China's National Mental Health Law.
Huang J; Shao Y; Ma H; Yang W; Li H
Int J Psychiatry Med; 2019 Jan; 54(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 30122100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.
Vears DF; Minion JT; Roberts SJ; Cummings J; Machirori M; Murtagh MJ
Per Med; 2021 May; 18(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 33822658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Appelbaum PS; Parens E; Waldman CR; Klitzman R; Fyer A; Martinez J; Price WN; Chung WK
Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4):22-32. PubMed ID: 24919982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethical basis of psychiatric research: conceptual issues and empirical findings.
Roberts LW
Compr Psychiatry; 1998; 39(3):99-110. PubMed ID: 9606575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review.
Khan A; Capps BJ; Sum MY; Kuswanto CN; Sim K
Clin Genet; 2014 Sep; 86(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 24646408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Next generation sequencing in psychiatric research: what study participants need to know about research findings.
Mathieu G; Groisman IJ; Godard B
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2013 Oct; 16(9):2119-27. PubMed ID: 23725748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consensus on Language for Advance Informed Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia Clinical Trials Using a Delphi Process.
Corneli A; Calvert SB; Powers JH; Swezey T; Collyar D; Perry B; Farley JJ; Santiago J; Donnelly HK; De Anda C; Blanchard K; Fowler VG; Holland TL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205435. PubMed ID: 32442291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 'CTRL': an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research.
Haas MA; Teare H; Prictor M; Ceregra G; Vidgen ME; Bunker D; Kaye J; Boughtwood T
Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Apr; 29(4):687-698. PubMed ID: 33408362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
