679 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30384845)
41. Imagined paralysis reduces motor cortex excitability.
Hartmann M; Falconer CJ; Kaelin-Lang A; Müri RM; Mast FW
Psychophysiology; 2022 Oct; 59(10):e14069. PubMed ID: 35393640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Corticospinal excitability during imagined and observed dynamic force production tasks: effortfulness matters.
Helm F; Marinovic W; Krüger B; Munzert J; Riek S
Neuroscience; 2015 Apr; 290():398-405. PubMed ID: 25639231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prestimulus cortical EEG oscillations can predict the excitability of the primary motor cortex.
Ogata K; Nakazono H; Uehara T; Tobimatsu S
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1508-1516. PubMed ID: 31235367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A BCI-Based Vibrotactile Neurofeedback Training Improves Motor Cortical Excitability During Motor Imagery.
Grigorev NA; Savosenkov AO; Lukoyanov MV; Udoratina A; Shusharina NN; Kaplan AY; Hramov AE; Kazantsev VB; Gordleeva S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1583-1592. PubMed ID: 34343094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Event-related desynchronization in reaction time paradigms: a comparison with event-related potentials and corticospinal excitability.
Leocani L; Toro C; Zhuang P; Gerloff C; Hallett M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 May; 112(5):923-30. PubMed ID: 11336910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Suppression of corticospinal excitability during negative motor imagery.
Sohn YH; Dang N; Hallett M
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 90(4):2303-9. PubMed ID: 14534268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Brain-Computer Interface Channel-Selection Strategy Based on Analysis of Event-Related Desynchronization Topography in Stroke Patients.
Li C; Jia T; Xu Q; Ji L; Pan Y
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():3817124. PubMed ID: 31559004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Brain State-Dependent Closed-Loop Modulation of Paired Associative Stimulation Controlled by Sensorimotor Desynchronization.
Royter V; Gharabaghi A
Front Cell Neurosci; 2016; 10():115. PubMed ID: 27242429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Modulation of corticospinal excitability during positive and negative motor imageries.
Yokota H; Mizuguchi N; Kakigi R; Nakata H
Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 672():1-5. PubMed ID: 29466720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An initial transient-state and reliable measures of corticospinal excitability in TMS studies.
Schmidt S; Cichy RM; Kraft A; Brocke J; Irlbacher K; Brandt SA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):987-93. PubMed ID: 19359215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of touching an object on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.
Mizuguchi N; Sakamoto M; Muraoka T; Kanosue K
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 196(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 19504259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for individual identification of the best electrode position for a motor imagery-based brain-computer interface.
Hänselmann S; Schneiders M; Weidner N; Rupp R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 12():71. PubMed ID: 26303933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Induction of LTD-like corticospinal plasticity by low-frequency rTMS depends on pre-stimulus phase of sensorimotor μ-rhythm.
Baur D; Galevska D; Hussain S; Cohen LG; Ziemann U; Zrenner C
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 32949780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of finger pinch motor imagery on short-latency afferent inhibition and corticospinal excitability.
Nakashoji K; Sasaki A; Kaneko N; Nomura T; Milosevic M
Neuroreport; 2024 Apr; 35(6):413-420. PubMed ID: 38526943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An adaptive filter bank for motor imagery based Brain Computer Interface.
Thomas KP; Guan C; Tong LC; Prasad VA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1104-7. PubMed ID: 19162856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with motor imagery on the corticospinal excitability of antagonist muscles.
Asao A; Hoshino Y; Nomura T; Shibuya K
Neuroreport; 2021 Jul; 32(10):894-898. PubMed ID: 34029290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Brain oscillatory activity during motor imagery in EEG-fMRI coregistration.
Formaggio E; Storti SF; Cerini R; Fiaschi A; Manganotti P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Dec; 28(10):1403-12. PubMed ID: 20850237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.
Ferreri F; Vecchio F; Ponzo D; Pasqualetti P; Rossini PM
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 May; 35(5):1969-80. PubMed ID: 23868714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Inhibition or facilitation? Modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.
Bruno V; Fossataro C; Garbarini F
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():360-368. PubMed ID: 29462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
