These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30385119)

  • 1. The effects of periodic interruptions on cortical entrainment to speech.
    Hambrook DA; Soni S; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():58-68. PubMed ID: 30385119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG oscillations entrain their phase to high-level features of speech sound.
    Zoefel B; VanRullen R
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):16-23. PubMed ID: 26341026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
    Etard O; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of distractor set-size on neural tracking of attended speech.
    Hambrook DA; Tata MS
    Brain Lang; 2019 Mar; 190():1-9. PubMed ID: 30616147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural mechanisms of phonemic restoration for speech comprehension revealed by magnetoencephalography.
    Sunami K; Ishii A; Takano S; Yamamoto H; Sakashita T; Tanaka M; Watanabe Y; Yamane H
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():164-73. PubMed ID: 24055105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. T'ain't the way you say it, it's what you say--perceptual continuity of voice and top-down restoration of speech.
    Clarke J; Gaudrain E; Chatterjee M; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Sep; 315():80-7. PubMed ID: 25019356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory and language contributions to neural encoding of speech features in noisy environments.
    Zou J; Feng J; Xu T; Jin P; Luo C; Zhang J; Pan X; Chen F; Zheng J; Ding N
    Neuroimage; 2019 May; 192():66-75. PubMed ID: 30822469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theta-band phase tracking in the two-talker problem.
    Hambrook DA; Tata MS
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():52-6. PubMed ID: 24911919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Time-Locking Mechanism in the Cortical Representation of Spoken Words.
    Nora A; Faisal A; Seol J; Renvall H; Formisano E; Salmelin R
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32513662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust cortical entrainment to the speech envelope relies on the spectro-temporal fine structure.
    Ding N; Chatterjee M; Simon JZ
    Neuroimage; 2014 Mar; 88():41-6. PubMed ID: 24188816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Music as a scaffold for listening to speech: Better neural phase-locking to song than speech.
    Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden CM; Joanisse MF; Grahn JA
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 214():116767. PubMed ID: 32217165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of acoustic periodicity and intelligibility on the neural oscillations in response to speech.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():173-181. PubMed ID: 27939190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech.
    Khalighinejad B; Cruzatto da Silva G; Mesgarani N
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(8):2176-2185. PubMed ID: 28119400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility.
    Kösem A; Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120040. PubMed ID: 36935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective perceptual phase entrainment to speech rhythm in the absence of spectral energy fluctuations.
    Zoefel B; VanRullen R
    J Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 35(5):1954-64. PubMed ID: 25653354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 18177159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcranial alternating current stimulation with speech envelopes modulates speech comprehension.
    Wilsch A; Neuling T; Obleser J; Herrmann CS
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():766-774. PubMed ID: 29355765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.
    Luo C; Ding N
    Elife; 2020 Dec; 9():. PubMed ID: 33345775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.