These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30385600)

  • 1. Blood Pressure Recording Practices Among Dental Hygiene Students.
    Sutton JD; Elledge SA; Scott JM; Rice CD
    J Dent Hyg; 2018 Oct; 92(5):38-44. PubMed ID: 30385600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inaccuracy of wrist-cuff oscillometric blood pressure devices: an arm position artefact?
    Mourad A; Gillies A; Carney S
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Apr; 10(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 15812253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brachial or wrist blood pressure in obese patients: which is the best?
    de Senarclens O; Feihl F; Giusti V; Engelberger RP; Rodieux F; Gomez P; Liaudet L; Waeber B
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 18496290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection.
    Clark JA; Lieh-Lai MW; Sarnaik A; Mattoo TK
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):920-3. PubMed ID: 12415030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obesity, hypertension and home sphygmomanometer cuffs.
    Akpolat T
    Eur J Intern Med; 2010 Aug; 21(4):338-40. PubMed ID: 20603048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
    Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The CNAP™ Finger Cuff for Noninvasive Beat-To-Beat Monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure: An Evaluation in Intensive Care Unit Patients and a Comparison with 2 Intermittent Devices.
    Lakhal K; Martin M; Faiz S; Ehrmann S; Blanloeil Y; Asehnoune K; Rozec B; Boulain T
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Nov; 123(5):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 27159068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of cuff positioning on blood pressure measurement accuracy: may a specially designed cuff make a difference?
    Bilo G; Sala O; Perego C; Faini A; Gao L; Głuszewska A; Ochoa JE; Pellegrini D; Lonati LM; Parati G
    Hypertens Res; 2017 Jun; 40(6):573-580. PubMed ID: 28077860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of normal and large sphygmomanometer cuffs using the Omron 705CP.
    Aylett M; Marples G; Jones K; Rhodes D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Feb; 15(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 11317193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and applicability of the Terumo ES-H55 double-cuff sphygmomanometer for hospital use.
    Tochikubo O; Nishijima K; Ohshige K; Kimura K
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Oct; 8(5):203-9. PubMed ID: 14624170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
    Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new double cuff sphygmotonometer for accurate blood pressure measurement.
    Tochikubo O; Watanabe J; Hanada K; Miyajima E; Kimura K
    Hypertens Res; 2001 Jul; 24(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 11510746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Korotkoff sound versus oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers: comparison between auscultatory and DynaPulse blood pressure measurements.
    Chio SS; Urbina EM; Lapointe J; Tsai J; Berenson GS
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2011; 5(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21269907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.