BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30386133)

  • 1. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of 1.5T and 3T Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Detecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
    Min JY; Ko SM; Song IY; Yi JG; Hwang HK; Shin JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1007-1020. PubMed ID: 30386133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla.
    Cheng AS; Pegg TJ; Karamitsos TD; Searle N; Jerosch-Herold M; Choudhury RP; Banning AP; Neubauer S; Robson MD; Selvanayagam JB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 49(25):2440-9. PubMed ID: 17599608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial).
    Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Debl K; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Sep; 14(1):61. PubMed ID: 22938651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Kim MY; Shin JK; Ko SM
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 29320864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
    Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.
    Klem I; Heitner JF; Shah DJ; Sketch MH; Behar V; Weinsaft J; Cawley P; Parker M; Elliott M; Judd RM; Kim RJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(8):1630-8. PubMed ID: 16631001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance profiling of coronary atherosclerosis: vessel wall remodelling and related myocardial blood flow alterations.
    Jahnke C; Manka R; Kozerke S; Schnackenburg B; Gebker R; Marx N; Paetsch I
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1400-10. PubMed ID: 25104810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately detects obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis of the CARMENTA Trial.
    van Cauteren YJM; Smulders MW; Theunissen RALJ; Gerretsen SC; Adriaans BP; Bijvoet GP; Mingels AMA; van Kuijk SMJ; Schalla S; Crijns HJGM; Kim RJ; Wildberger JE; Heijman J; Bekkers SCAM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):40. PubMed ID: 33752696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
    Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.
    Klem I; Greulich S; Heitner JF; Kim H; Vogelsberg H; Kispert EM; Ambati SR; Bruch C; Parker M; Judd RM; Kim RJ; Sechtem U
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jul; 1(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 19356464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additive value of 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease.
    Zhang L; Song X; Dong L; Li J; Dou R; Fan Z; An J; Li D
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 29706134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography, Stress Dual-Energy CT Perfusion, and Stress Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison with Combined Invasive Coronary Angiography and Stress Perfusion Cardiac MRI.
    Chung HW; Ko SM; Hwang HK; So Y; Yi JG; Lee EJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 28458600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
    Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress Perfusion Coronary Flow Reserve Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Known or Suspected CAD.
    Kato S; Saito N; Nakachi T; Fukui K; Iwasawa T; Taguri M; Kosuge M; Kimura K
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 70(7):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of myocardium perfusion with 3 T stress cardiac MRI.
    Yun CH; Tsai JP; Tsai CT; Mok GS; Sun JY; Hung CL; Wu TH; Huang WT; Yang FS; Lee JJ; Cury RC; Fares A; Nshisso LD; Bezerra HG
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2015 Dec; 15():164. PubMed ID: 26642757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
    Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
    Nissen L; Winther S; Westra J; Ejlersen JA; Isaksen C; Rossi A; Holm NR; Urbonaviciene G; Gormsen LC; Madsen LH; Christiansen EH; Maeng M; Knudsen LL; Frost L; Brix L; Bøtker HE; Petersen SE; Bøttcher M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 19(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 29447342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.