These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30386137)

  • 1. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Assessment of Ablative Margin Using Pre-RFA MRI and Post-RFA CT Registration.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Klotz E; Woo H; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 30386137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postablation assessment using follow-up registration of CT images before and after radiofrequency ablation (RFA): prospective evaluation of midterm therapeutic results of RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Shin S; Lee JM; Kim KW; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI; Klotz E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 24951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of Nonrigid Registration of Pre-Procedure MR with Post-Procedure CT After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park J; Lee JM; Lee DH; Joo I; Yoon JH; Park JY; Klotz E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):873-883. PubMed ID: 28091728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion.
    Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers.
    Bo XW; Xu HX; Guo LH; Sun LP; Li XL; Zhao CK; He YP; Liu BJ; Li DD; Zhang K; Wang D
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170063. PubMed ID: 28749166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Makino Y; Imai Y; Igura T; Hori M; Fukuda K; Sawai Y; Kogita S; Fujita N; Takehara T; Murakami T
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images.
    Takeyama N; Mizobuchi N; Sakaki M; Shimozuma Y; Munechika J; Kajiwara A; Uchikoshi M; Uozumi S; Ohgiya Y; Gokan T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):923-935. PubMed ID: 30327828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: precise assessment with a three-dimensional reconstruction technique using CT imaging.
    Jiang C; Liu B; Chen S; Peng Z; Xie X; Kuang M
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2018 Dec; 34(8):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 29392978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of ablative margin by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Okamoto K; Murawaki Y; Kakite S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2730-6. PubMed ID: 22137612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation.
    Laimer G; Schullian P; Jaschke N; Putzer D; Eberle G; Alzaga A; Odisio B; Bale R
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 32002642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging evaluation of ablative margin and index tumor immediately after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between multidetector-row CT and MR imaging.
    Kim SM; Shin SS; Lee BC; Kim JW; Heo SH; Lim HS; Jeong YY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2527-2537. PubMed ID: 28409202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D fusion is superior to 2D point-to-point contrast-enhanced US to evaluate the ablative margin after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Long H; Zhou X; Zhang X; Ye J; Huang T; Cong L; Xie X; Huang G
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 37572191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety margin assessment after radiofrequency ablation of the liver using registration of preprocedure and postprocedure CT images.
    Kim KW; Lee JM; Klotz E; Kim SJ; Kim SH; Kim JY; Han JK; Choi BI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W565-72. PubMed ID: 21512046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fusion of Preinterventional MR Imaging With Liver Perfusion CT After RFA of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Early Quantitative Prediction of Local Recurrence.
    Kobe A; Kindler Y; Klotz E; Puippe G; Messmer F; Alkadhi H; Pfammatter T
    Invest Radiol; 2021 Mar; 56(3):188-196. PubMed ID: 32932379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional registration of images obtained before and after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma to assess treatment adequacy.
    Sakakibara M; Ohkawa K; Katayama K; Imanaka K; Ishihara A; Hasegawa N; Kimura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):W487-95. PubMed ID: 24758684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ablation Zones and Margins for Predicting Local Tumor Progression.
    Hocquelet A; Trillaud H; Frulio N; Papadopoulos P; Balageas P; Salut C; Meyer M; Blanc JF; Montaudon M; Denis de Senneville B
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1038-1045.e2. PubMed ID: 27156743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of radiofrequency ablation margin by MRI-MRI image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Wang XL; Li K; Su ZZ; Huang ZP; Wang P; Zheng RQ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5345-51. PubMed ID: 25954109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.
    Fukuda K; Mori K; Hasegawa N; Nasu K; Ishige K; Okamoto Y; Shiigai M; Abei M; Minami M; Hyodo I
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):555-563. PubMed ID: 31102138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of the extracted-overlay function in CT/MR-ultrasonography fusion imaging for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Makino Y; Imai Y; Igura T; Kogita S; Sawai Y; Fukuda K; Hori M; Kudo M; Murakami T
    Dig Dis; 2013; 31(5-6):485-9. PubMed ID: 24281025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical usefulness of the ablative margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Okamoto T; Hodozuka M; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Oyama K; Hosho K; Okano J; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 63(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 26232269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.