These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30387868)

  • 1. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of acrylic bridges using optical coherence tomography.
    Al-Imam H; Michou S; Benetti AR; Gotfredsen K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 46(3):274-281. PubMed ID: 30387868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of adaptation of ceramic inlays using optical coherence tomography and replica technique.
    Ayse Gozde T; Metin S; Mubin U
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Feb; 32():e005. PubMed ID: 29412222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings.
    Lins L; Bemfica V; Queiroz C; Canabarro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 25453562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation.
    Kim JH; Cho BH; Lee JH; Kwon SJ; Yi YA; Shin Y; Roh BD; Seo DG
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Feb; 73(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 25299600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
    Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Hybrid Abutment Assemblies After Central and Local Manufacturing, Respectively.
    Gehrke P; Sing T; Fischer C; Spintzyk S; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):808-814. PubMed ID: 30024996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers.
    Aboushelib MN; Elmahy WA; Ghazy MH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):670-7. PubMed ID: 22542500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of marginal gap of lithium disilicate glass ceramic crowns with optical coherence tomography.
    Li W; Liu J; Zhang Z
    J Biomed Opt; 2018 Mar; 23(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 29500872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility.
    Schaefer O; Watts DC; Sigusch BW; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 22265824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
    Nakamura T; Dei N; Kojima T; Wakabayashi K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12854786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.