278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30387889)
21. Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.
Kulathinal RJ; Bennett SM; Fitzpatrick CL; Noor MA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(29):10051-6. PubMed ID: 18621713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Local Inversion Heterozygosity Alters Recombination throughout the Genome.
Crown KN; Miller DE; Sekelsky J; Hawley RS
Curr Biol; 2018 Sep; 28(18):2984-2990.e3. PubMed ID: 30174188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.
Guillén Y; Ruiz A
BMC Genomics; 2012 Feb; 13():53. PubMed ID: 22296923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genomics of natural populations: Evolutionary forces that establish and maintain gene arrangements in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Fuller ZL; Haynes GD; Richards S; Schaeffer SW
Mol Ecol; 2017 Dec; 26(23):6539-6562. PubMed ID: 29055159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genome-wide tests for introgression between cactophilic Drosophila implicate a role of inversions during speciation.
Lohse K; Clarke M; Ritchie MG; Etges WJ
Evolution; 2015 May; 69(5):1178-90. PubMed ID: 25824653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-read based assembly and synteny analysis of a reference Drosophila subobscura genome reveals signatures of structural evolution driven by inversions recombination-suppression effects.
Karageorgiou C; Gámez-Visairas V; Tarrío R; Rodríguez-Trelles F
BMC Genomics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):223. PubMed ID: 30885123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.
Stevison LS; Noor MA
J Mol Evol; 2010 Dec; 71(5-6):332-45. PubMed ID: 20890595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fine-Mapping Complex Inversion Breakpoints and Investigating Somatic Pairing in the
Corbett-Detig RB; Said I; Calzetta M; Genetti M; McBroome J; Maurer NW; Petrarca V; Della Torre A; Besansky NJ
Genetics; 2019 Dec; 213(4):1495-1511. PubMed ID: 31666292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The joy of balancers.
Miller DE; Cook KR; Hawley RS
PLoS Genet; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1008421. PubMed ID: 31697682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Principles of genome evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.
Ranz JM; Maurin D; Chan YS; von Grotthuss M; Hillier LW; Roote J; Ashburner M; Bergman CM
PLoS Biol; 2007 Jun; 5(6):e152. PubMed ID: 17550304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations.
Guerrero RF; Rousset F; Kirkpatrick M
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 367(1587):430-8. PubMed ID: 22201172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Genome Evolution in Three Species of Cactophilic Drosophila.
Sanchez-Flores A; Peñaloza F; Carpinteyro-Ponce J; Nazario-Yepiz N; Abreu-Goodger C; Machado CA; Markow TA
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Oct; 6(10):3097-3105. PubMed ID: 27489210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recombination and selection in the maintenance of the adaptive value of inversions.
Pegueroles C; Ordóñez V; Mestres F; Pascual M
J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2709-17. PubMed ID: 20964762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental introgression in Drosophila: Asymmetric postzygotic isolation associated with chromosomal inversions and an incompatibility locus on the X chromosome.
Poikela N; Laetsch DR; Kankare M; Hoikkala A; Lohse K
Mol Ecol; 2023 Feb; 32(4):854-866. PubMed ID: 36461113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The molecular genealogy of sequential overlapping inversions implies both homologous chromosomes of a heterokaryotype in an inversion origin.
Orengo DJ; Puerma E; Cereijo U; Aguadé M
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17009. PubMed ID: 31740730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Selection on Inversion Breakpoints Favors Proximity to Pairing Sensitive Sites in Drosophila melanogaster.
Corbett-Detig RB
Genetics; 2016 Sep; 204(1):259-65. PubMed ID: 27343234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inversion evolutionary rates might limit the experimental identification of inversion breakpoints in non-model species.
Puerma E; Orengo DJ; Aguadé M
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17281. PubMed ID: 29222501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster.
Coyne JA; Meyers W; Crittenden AP; Sniegowski P
Genetics; 1993 Jun; 134(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 8325485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chromosomal speciation of humans and chimpanzees revisited: studies of DNA divergence within inverted regions.
Szamalek JM; Cooper DN; Hoegel J; Hameister H; Kehrer-Sawatzki H
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2007; 116(1-2):53-60. PubMed ID: 17268178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evolutionary history of the third chromosome gene arrangements of Drosophila pseudoobscura inferred from inversion breakpoints.
Wallace AG; Detweiler D; Schaeffer SW
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Aug; 28(8):2219-29. PubMed ID: 21339510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
