These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30388433)

  • 1. What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.
    Sikos L; Tomlinson SB; Heins C; Grodner DJ
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():275-285. PubMed ID: 30388433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tracking Colisteners' Knowledge States During Language Comprehension.
    Jouravlev O; Schwartz R; Ayyash D; Mineroff Z; Gibson E; Fedorenko E
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 30444681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 18556057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of speakers' gaze on situated language comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.
    Jachmann TK; Drenhaus H; Staudte M; Crocker MW
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103571. PubMed ID: 31202157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speaker Demographics Modulate Listeners' Neural Correlates of Spoken Word Processing.
    Wu H; Duan X; Cai ZG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 36(10):2208-2226. PubMed ID: 39023368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autistic adults anticipate and integrate meaning based on the speaker's voice: Evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials.
    Barzy M; Black J; Williams D; Ferguson HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 31714095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous perspective-taking in real-time language comprehension: evidence from eye-movements and grain of coordination.
    Wei Y; Wan Y; Tanenhaus MK
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8031. PubMed ID: 38580679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity to Referential Ambiguity in Discourse: The Role of Attention, Working Memory, and Verbal Ability.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Traxler MJ; Lesh TA; Dave S; Mangun GR; Carter CS; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2309-23. PubMed ID: 26401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension.
    van Berkum JJ; Brown CM; Hagoort P; Zwitserlood P
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 12820864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.
    Tanner D; Bulkes NZ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1753-63. PubMed ID: 25987192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
    Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1849-1858. PubMed ID: 30556724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: evidence from eye movements and ERPs.
    Filik R; Leuthold H
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():94-104. PubMed ID: 23419895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds.
    Ferguson HJ; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():113-25. PubMed ID: 18722356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Referential context and executive functioning influence children's resolution of syntactic ambiguity.
    Qi Z; Love J; Fisher C; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1922-1947. PubMed ID: 32584080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research.
    Rayner K; Clifton C
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 18565638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground.
    Barr DJ
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):18-40. PubMed ID: 18760407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Common Ground Information Affects Reference Resolution: Evidence From Behavioral Data, ERPs, and Eye-Tracking.
    Richter M; Paul M; Höhle B; Wartenburger I
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():565651. PubMed ID: 33329197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Even a rich man can afford that expensive house: ERP responses to construction-based pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension.
    Jiang X; Li Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1857-66. PubMed ID: 23774181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.