These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30388940)

  • 1. Scientific Evolution of Clinical and Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Tools.
    Miccio-Fonseca LC; Rasmussen LAL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2018; 27(8):871-900. PubMed ID: 30388940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. We are
    Miccio-Fonseca LC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2023 Feb; 32(2):133-152. PubMed ID: 36797815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Predictive Validity of JSORRAT-II and MEGA
    Rasmussen LAL
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Aug; 62(10):2937-2953. PubMed ID: 28863722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEGA ♪ --Empirical Support for Nomenclature on the Anomalies: Sexually Violent and Predatory Youth.
    Miccio-Fonseca LC; Rasmussen LA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Oct; 59(11):1222-38. PubMed ID: 24793314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contemporary Risk Assessment Tools: Should We Use Them for Sexually Abusive Children Ages 4 to 12 Years?
    Miccio-Fonseca LC
    J Child Adolesc Trauma; 2020 Jun; 13(2):141-151. PubMed ID: 32549926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.
    Chu CM; Ng K; Fong J; Teoh J
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Apr; 24(2):153-74. PubMed ID: 21825111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Miccio-Fonseca LC
    J Child Adolesc Trauma; 2019 Dec; 12(4):457-467. PubMed ID: 32318215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.
    Zeng G; Chu CM; Lee Y
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 25527632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Family Lovemap and Erotically Related Protective Factors.
    Miccio-Fonseca LC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2018; 27(8):901-917. PubMed ID: 30064305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Miccio-Fonseca LC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2020 Apr; 29(3):351-372. PubMed ID: 32134697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II.
    Epperson DL; Ralston CA
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Dec; 27(6):529-58. PubMed ID: 24492618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paradigm shift: implementing MEGA, a new tool proposed to define and assess sexually abusive dynamics in youth ages 19 and under.
    Rasmussen LA; Miccio-Fonseca LC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(1):85-106. PubMed ID: 17255078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are Juveniles Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses the Same Everywhere? Psychometric Properties of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II in a Portuguese Youth Sample.
    Barroso R; Pechorro P; Ramião E; Figueiredo P; Manita C; Gonçalves RA; Nobre P
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):806-825. PubMed ID: 31221049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Using Documented but Uncharged Offense Data on JSORRAT-II Predictive Validity.
    Ralston CA; Sarkar A; Philipp GT; Epperson DL
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Mar; 29(2):186-202. PubMed ID: 25896905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emerging strategies for risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: theory, controversy and practice.
    Prescott DS
    J Child Sex Abus; 2004; 13(3-4):83-105. PubMed ID: 15914391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior among youth in a child welfare sample.
    Prentky RA; Li NC; Righthand S; Schuler A; Cavanaugh D; Lee AF
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 20101590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuropsychological Risk Factors to Consider When Assessing for Sexually Abusive Youth.
    Karsten TM; Dempsey R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2018; 27(8):936-954. PubMed ID: 30427770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II in an Australian Context.
    Molnar T; Allard T; McKillop N; Rynne J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Aug; 66(10-11):1051-1070. PubMed ID: 31957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.