160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30388941)
41. Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.
; Rieckmann P; Centonze D; Elovaara I; Giovannoni G; Havrdová E; Kesselring J; Kobelt G; Langdon D; Morrow SA; Oreja-Guevara C; Schippling S; Thalheim C; Thompson H; Vermersch P; Aston K; Bauer B; Demory C; Giambastiani MP; Hlavacova J; Nouvet-Gire J; Pepper G; Pontaga M; Rogan E; Rogalski C; van Galen P; Ben-Amor AF
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Jan; 19():153-160. PubMed ID: 29241142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Coping with tinnitus.
ASHA; 1990 May; 32(5):61. PubMed ID: 2337425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Why Is Tinnitus a Problem? A Qualitative Analysis of Problems Reported by Tinnitus Patients.
Watts EJ; Fackrell K; Smith S; Sheldrake J; Haider H; Hoare DJ
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518812250. PubMed ID: 30482102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Transforming Patient-Centered Care: Development of the Evidence Informed Decision Making through Engagement Model.
Moore JE; Titler MG; Kane Low L; Dalton VK; Sampselle CM
Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 25864022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer.
Weaver MS; Baker JN; Gattuso JS; Gibson DV; Sykes AD; Hinds PS
Cancer; 2015 Dec; 121(24):4416-24. PubMed ID: 26348790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patients with cancer: their approaches to participation in treatment plan decisions.
Ramfelt E; Lützén K
Nurs Ethics; 2005 Mar; 12(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 15791784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Situationally influenced tinnitus coping strategies: a mixed methods approach.
Beukes EW; Manchaiah V; Andersson G; Allen PM; Terlizzi PM; Baguley DM
Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 40(24):2884-2894. PubMed ID: 28793790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study.
Swancutt DR; Greenfield SM; Wilson S
BMC Womens Health; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18194523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Psychosocial treatment of tinnitus].
Jacobs JB; Tromp EC
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1994; 48(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 7810307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. "They do what they think is the best for me." Frail elderly patients' preferences for participation in their care during hospitalization.
Ekdahl AW; Andersson L; Friedrichsen M
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Aug; 80(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 19945814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Classical conditioning as the basis for the effective treatment of tinnitus-related distress.
Wilson PH
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(1):6-11; discussion 11-3. PubMed ID: 16514257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Living with tinnitus and the health care journey: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Marks E; Smith P; McKenna L
Br J Health Psychol; 2019 May; 24(2):250-264. PubMed ID: 30609202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A multi-site service evaluation of the tinnitus care decision aid.
Pryce H; Ward M; Turton L; Stanley J; Goss J
Int J Audiol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):84-87. PubMed ID: 33752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Identifying a conceptual shift in child and adolescent-reported treatment decision making: "Having a say, as I need at this time".
Kelly KP; Mowbray C; Pyke-Grimm K; Hinds PS
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28221731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Mayo Clinic office visit. Tinnitus. An interview with Charles Beatty, M.D.
Beatty C
Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2009 Feb; 13(2):6. PubMed ID: 19112343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Patient-centered tinnitus management tool: a clinical audit.
Aazh H; Moore BC; Roberts P
Am J Audiol; 2009 Jun; 18(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 19380508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Decision-Making in Audiology: Balancing Evidence-Based Practice and Patient-Centered Care.
Boisvert I; Clemesha J; Lundmark E; Crome E; Barr C; McMahon CM
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706397. PubMed ID: 28752808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Overdue choices: how information and role in decision-making influence women's preferences for induction for prolonged pregnancy.
Stevens G; Miller YD
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 23281907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Nephrologists' perspectives on cancer screening in patients with chronic kidney disease: An interview study.
James L; Wong G; Craig JC; Howard K; Howell M; Tong A
Nephrology (Carlton); 2019 Apr; 24(4):414-421. PubMed ID: 29633488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The use of research evidence on patient preferences in health care decision-making: issues, controversies and moving forward.
Dirksen CD
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):785-94. PubMed ID: 25135194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
