406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30388942)
1. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic narrative synthesis of acute amplification-induced improvements in cognitive ability in hearing-impaired adults.
Kalluri S; Ahmann B; Munro KJ
Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):455-463. PubMed ID: 31008660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids for adults with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol.
Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e011683. PubMed ID: 27789514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29338464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
Johnson EE
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S29-S30. PubMed ID: 28635502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.
Denk F; Hiipakka M; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S62-S70. PubMed ID: 28635506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the device-oriented subjective outcome (DOSO) scale to measure outcomes of different hearing aids.
Xu J; Galster J; Galster E; Gruhlke A; Wolfe A
Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):584-591. PubMed ID: 29621924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there evidence for the added value and correct use of manual and automatically switching multimemory hearing devices? A scoping review.
de Graaff F; Huysmans E; Ket JCF; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Leemans CR; Smits C
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):176-183. PubMed ID: 29017358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
Moore BC; Popelka GR
Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving uptake and outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older adults: what are the barriers and facilitators?
Hickson L; Meyer C
Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 24528289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.
Völker C; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 27873543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.
Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 19010794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users.
Lelic D; Nielsen LLA; Pedersen AK; Neher T
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241246616. PubMed ID: 38656770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
