These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Bringing probability judgments into policy debates via forecasting tournaments. Tetlock PE; Mellers BA; Scoblic JP Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):481-483. PubMed ID: 28154049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conservatism, anti-vaccination attitudes, and intellectual humility: examining their associations through a social judgment theory framework. Huynh HP; Dicke-Bohmann A; Zsila Á J Behav Med; 2024 Apr; 47(2):184-196. PubMed ID: 37848749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is political extremism supported by an illusion of understanding? Sloman SA; Vives ML Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105146. PubMed ID: 35533417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From discipline-centered rivalries to solution-centered science: Producing better probability estimates for policy makers. Mellers BA; Tetlock PE Am Psychol; 2019 Apr; 74(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 30945892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Belief in a Favorable Future. Rogers T; Moore DA; Norton MI Psychol Sci; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1290-1301. PubMed ID: 28771396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the influence of intellectual humility, religiosity, and political conservatism on vaccine attitudes in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Preston JL; Khan A Public Underst Sci; 2024 Apr; 33(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 37596812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Toner K; Leary MR; Asher MW; Jongman-Sereno KP Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2454-62. PubMed ID: 24096379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition. Feinberg M; Wehling E PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193347. PubMed ID: 29641618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human judgement forecasting tournaments: A feasibility study based on the COVID-19 pandemic with public health practitioners in England. Davies N; Ferris S Public Health Pract (Oxf); 2022 Jun; 3():100260. PubMed ID: 35479262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thought as a determinant of political opinion. Sloman SA; Rabb N Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():1-7. PubMed ID: 30853110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Fernbach PM; Rogers T; Fox CR; Sloman SA Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):939-46. PubMed ID: 23620547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The psychology of intelligence analysis: drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics. Mellers B; Stone E; Atanasov P; Rohrbaugh N; Metz SE; Ungar L; Bishop MM; Horowitz M; Merkle E; Tetlock P J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Mar; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 25581088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback. Strandberg T; Olson JA; Hall L; Woods A; Johansson P PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0226799. PubMed ID: 32023249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epistemic spillovers: Learning others' political views reduces the ability to assess and use their expertise in nonpolitical domains. Marks J; Copland E; Loh E; Sunstein CR; Sharot T Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():74-84. PubMed ID: 30342868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the origins of political views: biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults. Hussak LJ; Cimpian A Dev Sci; 2018 May; 21(3):e12567. PubMed ID: 28722292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking. Zmigrod L Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jul; 17(4):1072-1092. PubMed ID: 35231196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False beliefs and confabulation can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes. Strandberg T; Sivén D; Hall L; Johansson P; Pärnamets P J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1382-1399. PubMed ID: 30148387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: the appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies. Friesen JP; Campbell TH; Kay AC J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 108(3):515-29. PubMed ID: 25402678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]