BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30389250)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
    J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
    Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system.
    Pujol J; Ondategui-Parra JC; Badiella L; Otero C; Vilaseca M; Aldaba M
    J Optom; 2017; 10(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 26856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
    Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults: an update.
    Mallen EA; Gilmartin B; Wolffsohn JS; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 26497294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steps towards Smarter Solutions in Optometry and Ophthalmology-Inter-Device Agreement of Subjective Methods to Assess the Refractive Errors of the Eye.
    Ohlendorf A; Leube A; Wahl S
    Healthcare (Basel); 2016 Jul; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 27417629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective refraction using power vectors by updating a conventional phoropter with a Stokes lens for continuous astigmatic power generation.
    Moreno JRA; Micó V; Albarrán Diego C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 37264763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction.
    Bullimore MA; Fusaro RE; Adams CW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Aug; 75(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 9734807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
    Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.
    Salmon TO; West RW; Gasser W; Kenmore T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 12553539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.