257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30389965)
1. Combining morpho-taxonomy and metabarcoding enhances the detection of non-indigenous marine pests in biofouling communities.
Ammon UV; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Tait L; Lavery S; Inglis GJ; Pochon X
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16290. PubMed ID: 30389965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metabarcoding improves detection of eukaryotes from early biofouling communities: implications for pest monitoring and pathway management.
Zaiko A; Schimanski K; Pochon X; Hopkins GA; Goldstien S; Floerl O; Wood SA
Biofouling; 2016 Jul; 32(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 27212415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-marker metabarcoding approach to study mesozooplankton at basin scale.
Stefanni S; Stanković D; Borme D; de Olazabal A; Juretić T; Pallavicini A; Tirelli V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12085. PubMed ID: 30108256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys.
Grey EK; Bernatchez L; Cassey P; Deiner K; Deveney M; Howland KL; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Leong SCY; Li Y; Olds B; Pfrender ME; Prowse TAA; Renshaw MA; Lodge DM
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8843. PubMed ID: 29891968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring of biofouling communities in a Portuguese port using a combined morphological and metabarcoding approach.
Azevedo J; Antunes JT; Machado AM; Vasconcelos V; Leão PN; Froufe E
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13461. PubMed ID: 32778680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metabarcoding of marine environmental DNA based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes.
Günther B; Knebelsberger T; Neumann H; Laakmann S; Martínez Arbizu P
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14822. PubMed ID: 30287908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-read DNA metabarcoding of ribosomal RNA in the analysis of fungi from aquatic environments.
Heeger F; Bourne EC; Baschien C; Yurkov A; Bunk B; Spröer C; Overmann J; Mazzoni CJ; Monaghan MT
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1500-1514. PubMed ID: 30106226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Water eDNA metabarcoding is effective in detecting non-native species in marinas, but detection errors still hinder its use for passive monitoring.
Couton M; Lévêque L; Daguin-Thiébaut C; Comtet T; Viard F
Biofouling; 2022 Apr; 38(4):367-383. PubMed ID: 35575060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcodes of Antipode marine invertebrates in Bay of Biscay and Gulf of Lion ports suggest new biofouling challenges.
Miralles L; Ardura A; Clusa L; Garcia-Vazquez E
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16214. PubMed ID: 30385812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR and metabarcoding for species-specific detection in environmental DNA.
Wood SA; Pochon X; Laroche O; von Ammon U; Adamson J; Zaiko A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1407-1419. PubMed ID: 31293089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unveiling the Biodiversity of Deep-Sea Nematodes through Metabarcoding: Are We Ready to Bypass the Classical Taxonomy?
Dell'Anno A; Carugati L; Corinaldesi C; Riccioni G; Danovaro R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144928. PubMed ID: 26701112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Status and prospects of marine NIS detection and monitoring through (e)DNA metabarcoding.
Duarte S; Vieira PE; Lavrador AS; Costa FO
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jan; 751():141729. PubMed ID: 32889465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA metabarcoding of littoral hard-bottom communities: high diversity and database gaps revealed by two molecular markers.
Wangensteen OS; Palacín C; Guardiola M; Turon X
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4705. PubMed ID: 29740514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PEMA: a flexible Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Analysis of the 16S/18S ribosomal RNA, ITS, and COI marker genes.
Zafeiropoulos H; Viet HQ; Vasileiadou K; Potirakis A; Arvanitidis C; Topalis P; Pavloudi C; Pafilis E
Gigascience; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32161947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MetaZooGene Atlas and Database: Reference Sequences for Marine Ecosystems.
O'Brien TD; Blanco-Bercial L; Questel JM; Batta-Lona PG; Bucklin A
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2744():475-489. PubMed ID: 38683336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water.
Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haptophyte Diversity and Vertical Distribution Explored by 18S and 28S Ribosomal RNA Gene Metabarcoding and Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Gran-Stadniczeñko S; Šupraha L; Egge ED; Edvardsen B
J Eukaryot Microbiol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):514-532. PubMed ID: 27973742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A set of nematode rRNA cistron databases and a primer assessment tool to enable more flexible and comprehensive metabarcoding.
Charrier E; Chen R; Thundathil N; Gilleard JS
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13965. PubMed ID: 38733216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
