These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30390398)

  • 21. An assessment of vibration threshold using a biothesiometer compared to a C128-Hz tuning fork.
    Temlett JA
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1435-8. PubMed ID: 19695882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current perception threshold and the HAVS Stockholm sensorineural scale.
    House R; Krajnak K; Manno M; Lander L
    Occup Med (Lond); 2009 Oct; 59(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 19460876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Proposal of a new method for the use of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork in the screening of diabetic polyneuropathy. A pilot study.
    de Simone R; Rabitti PG; De Feo EM; Manguso F; Piscopo G; Scionti L
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 May; 108(2):e21-4. PubMed ID: 25773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vibrotactile perception thresholds as determined by two different devices in a working population.
    Wenemark M; Lundström R; Hagberg M; Nilsson T
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1996 Jun; 22(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 8837266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of proprioceptive allodynia after tooth-clenching exercises.
    Dawson A; List T; Ernberg M; Svensson P
    J Orofac Pain; 2012; 26(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 22292139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Improvement of temperature and vibration sense in chronic uremia after a single dialysis].
    Hilz MJ; Claus D; Rösl G; Hofmann E; Braun J; Neundörfer B
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 1995 Jul; 63(7):264-9. PubMed ID: 7672749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The reliability of the current perception threshold in volunteers and its applicability in a clinical setting.
    Gaudreault F; Drolet P; Fallaha M; Varin F
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Mar; 120(3):678-683. PubMed ID: 25590790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vibration perception threshold testing in patients with diabetic neuropathy: ceiling effects and reliability.
    van Deursen RW; Sanchez MM; Derr JA; Becker MB; Ulbrecht JS; Cavanagh PR
    Diabet Med; 2001 Jun; 18(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 11472466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nerve conduction studies and current perception thresholds in workers assessed for hand-arm vibration syndrome.
    Lander L; Lou W; House R
    Occup Med (Lond); 2007 Jun; 57(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 17429102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
    Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic accuracy of qualitative versus quantitative tuning forks: outcome measure for neuropathy.
    Lai S; Ahmed U; Bollineni A; Lewis R; Ramchandren S
    J Clin Neuromuscul Dis; 2014 Mar; 15(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 24534830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of perception threshold testing and thermal-vibratory testing.
    Lowenstein L; Jesse K; Kenton K
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Apr; 37(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 18067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Low efficacy using the 256-Hz tuning fork when evaluating the influence of somatosensation in balance control for relatively healthy elderly.
    Hafström A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 138(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 30113876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring vibration sensations with graduated tuning fork. Simple and reliable means to detect diabetic patients at risk of neuropathic foot ulceration.
    Thivolet C; el Farkh J; Petiot A; Simonet C; Tourniaire J
    Diabetes Care; 1990 Oct; 13(10):1077-80. PubMed ID: 2209306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility of different methods for diagnosing and monitoring diabetic neuropathy.
    Nasseri K; Strijers RL; Dekhuijzen LS; Buster M; Bertelsmann FW
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998; 38(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 9741007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantitative vibration threshold testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis strategies for optimizing reliability.
    Hubbard MC; MacDermid JC; Kramer JF; Birmingham TB
    J Hand Ther; 2004; 17(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 14770135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensory perception threshold measurement: an evaluation of semiobjective testing devices.
    Halar EM; Hammond MC; LaCava EC; Camann C; Ward J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Aug; 68(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 3619613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vibration sensibility testing in the workplace. Day-to-day reliability.
    Rosecrance JC; Cook TM; Satre DL; Goode JD; Schroder MJ
    J Occup Med; 1994 Sep; 36(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 7823216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
    Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vibration sensitivity thresholds: methodological considerations.
    Aaserud O; Juntunen J; Matikainen E
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1990 Oct; 82(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 2270757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.