These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30390619)

  • 1. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Romé H; Marois D; Henshall J; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):50. PubMed ID: 31533614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Broiler breeding strategies using indirect carcass measurements.
    Zerehdaran S; Vereijken AL; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H; van der Waaij EH
    Poult Sci; 2005 Aug; 84(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 16156205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Zhao HH; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Stricker C; Habier D; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Lamont SJ; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jul; 47(1):59. PubMed ID: 26149977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhy A; Esmailizadeh A; Fozi MA; Kranis A; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):16. PubMed ID: 28148241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.
    Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2021-32. PubMed ID: 16100056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3908-16. PubMed ID: 21841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.
    Lourenco DA; Fragomeni BO; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Zumbach B; Hawken RJ; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jul; 47(1):56. PubMed ID: 26133806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
    Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.