These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30393392)

  • 1. The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence.
    Everett JAC; Faber NS; Savulescu J; Crockett MJ
    J Exp Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 79():200-216. PubMed ID: 30393392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology": Correction.
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):164. PubMed ID: 29658728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.
    Kahane G; Everett JAC; Earp BD; Caviola L; Faber NS; Crockett MJ; Savulescu J
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):131-164. PubMed ID: 29265854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of perspective switching and utilitarian thinking on moral judgments in a sacrificial dilemma among healthcare and non-healthcare students.
    Park J; Shin Y; Kim S; Maeng S; Ihm J
    Curr Psychol; 2023 Feb; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 36820198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the uneasy alliance between moral bioenhancement and utilitarianism.
    Kudlek K
    Bioethics; 2022 Feb; 36(2):210-217. PubMed ID: 34798678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Consequentialist Scale: Translation and empirical investigation in a Greek sample.
    Kosteletos G; Zioga I; Protopapadakis ED; Panayiotou AG; Kontoangelos K; Papageorgiou C
    Heliyon; 2023 Jul; 9(7):e18386. PubMed ID: 37539210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What We Talk About When We Talk About Morality: Deontological, Consequentialist, and Emotive Language Use in Justifications Across Foundation-Specific Moral Violations.
    Wheeler MA; Laham SM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1206-16. PubMed ID: 27340149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Core values versus common sense: consequentialist views appear less rooted in morality.
    Kreps TA; Monin B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1529-42. PubMed ID: 25252937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrasting two models of utilitarian reasoning.
    Antoniou R; Romero-Kornblum H; Young JC; You M; Kramer JH; Rankin KP; Chiong W
    Heliyon; 2023 Jul; 9(7):e17498. PubMed ID: 37424598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COVID-19, Scarce Resources and Priority Ethics: Why Should Maximizers Be More Conservative?
    Afroogh S; Kazemi A; Seyedkazemi A
    Ethics Med Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18():100698. PubMed ID: 36569744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis.
    Everett JAC; Colombatto C; Awad E; Boggio P; Bos B; Brady WJ; Chawla M; Chituc V; Chung D; Drupp MA; Goel S; Grosskopf B; Hjorth F; Ji A; Kealoha C; Kim JS; Lin Y; Ma Y; Maréchal MA; Mancinelli F; Mathys C; Olsen AL; Pearce G; Prosser AMB; Reggev N; Sabin N; Senn J; Shin YS; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Sjåstad H; Strick M; Sul S; Tummers L; Turner M; Yu H; Zoh Y; Crockett MJ
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Aug; 5(8):1074-1088. PubMed ID: 34211151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Religious moral righteousness over care: a review and a meta-analysis.
    Saroglou V; Craninx M
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2021 Aug; 40():79-85. PubMed ID: 33039946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personality and moral judgment: Curious consequentialists and polite deontologists.
    Smillie LD; Katic M; Laham SM
    J Pers; 2021 May; 89(3):549-564. PubMed ID: 33025607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
    Everett JA; Pizarro DA; Crockett MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jun; 145(6):772-87. PubMed ID: 27054685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forensic psychiatry, one subspecialty with two ethics? A systematic review.
    Niveau G; Welle I
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29636102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-consequentialism, the person as an end-in-itself, and the significance of status.
    Kamm FM
    Philos Public Aff; 1992; 21(4):354-89. PubMed ID: 11659509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral foundations, values, and judgments in extraordinary altruists.
    Amormino P; Ploe ML; Marsh AA
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22111. PubMed ID: 36543878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
    Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are.
    Capraro V; Sippel J; Zhao B; Hornischer L; Savary M; Terzopoulou Z; Faucher P; Griffioen SF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205066. PubMed ID: 30307977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.