These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30394293)
1. The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice. McDevitt MA; Pisklak JM; Spetch M; Dunn R Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():279-285. PubMed ID: 30394293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human and pigeon suboptimal choice. McDevitt MA; Diller JW; Pietrzykowski MO Learn Behav; 2019 Dec; 47(4):334-343. PubMed ID: 31429009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes. Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 26676182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice? Case JP; Zentall TR Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():320-326. PubMed ID: 30077654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long. Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):301-310. PubMed ID: 31070433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies. Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast between what is expected and what occurs increases pigeon's suboptimal choice. Zentall TR; Andrews DM; Case JP Anim Cogn; 2019 Jan; 22(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 30430348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When good news leads to bad choices. McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML; Ludvig EA J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jan; 105(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 26781050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length. Spetch ML; Belke TW; Barnet RC; Dunn R; Pierce WD J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 2324664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate. Smith AP; Zentall TR J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice. McDevitt MA; Williams BA J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination? Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency and value both matter in the suboptimal choice procedure. Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30569554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration. Urcuioli PJ; DeMarse TB; Lionello KM J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):279-97. PubMed ID: 10605100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli. Mazur JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 9821679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure to find a distance effect in pigeon choice. Bell MC; Sanabria F J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28542842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]