These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30395263)

  • 1. Instructor and Trainee Judgments of Cohesion in Mixed-Gender Military Teams.
    Orme GJ; Kehoe EJ
    Mil Med; 2019 May; 184(5-6):e131-e136. PubMed ID: 30395263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cohesion and Performance in Military Occupation Specialty Training.
    Orme GJ; Kehoe JE
    Mil Med; 2020 Mar; 185(3-4):e325-e330. PubMed ID: 31642492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of Cohesion in Mixed-Gender Recruit Training.
    Orme GJ; Kehoe EJ
    Mil Med; 2019 Jul; 184(7-8):e212-e217. PubMed ID: 30690453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women and Men Together in Recruit Training.
    Orme GJ; Kehoe EJ
    Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e147-e152. PubMed ID: 29425352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recruit Perspectives on Gender Integration at Recruit Training: A Comparison by Service and Gender.
    Montgomery S; Kleykamp M; Lovalekar M
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):57-66. PubMed ID: 38920038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing Gender Integration in U.S. Marine Corps Recruit Training: Policy Recommendations and Rationales From an Interdisciplinary Study.
    Montgomery S; Lovalekar M; Kleykamp M; Lucas JW; Arent SM; McFadden BA; Keenan KA; Allison K; Peterson P; Cruz DE; Nindl BC
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):94-103. PubMed ID: 38920041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recruit Profiles Across the U.S. Armed Forces: Implications for Increasing Gender Integration in Recruit Training.
    Kleykamp M; Montgomery S; Lovalekar M
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):47-56. PubMed ID: 38920032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Drill Instructors and Gender Integration at Recruit Training: Examining Intersections of Gender and Integration in the Recruit Training Environment.
    Montgomery S; Cassar-Uhl D; Burleson L
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):67-73. PubMed ID: 38920033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design Considerations for a Multidisciplinary Approach to Provide Policy Recommendations on Gender-Integrated Recruit Training in the Marine Corps.
    Lovalekar M; Montgomery S; Arent SM; Kleykamp M; Lucas J; McFadden BA; Keenan KA; Allison K; Peterson P; Cruz DE; Nindl BC
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):3-11. PubMed ID: 38920039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Military Health Care Team Cohesion and Performance During Simulation Training.
    Melo E; Cole R
    Mil Med; 2024 Jul; 189(7-8):e1552-e1561. PubMed ID: 38126796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical and Mental Health of US Air Force Military Training Instructors.
    Webber BJ; Flower AM; Pathak SR; Burganowski RP; Pawlak MT; Gottfredson RC; White BK; Young JA
    Mil Med; 2019 May; 184(5-6):e248-e254. PubMed ID: 30690457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resilience-based intervention for UK military recruits: a randomised controlled trial.
    Jones N; Whelan C; Harden L; Macfarlane A; Burdett H; Greenberg N
    Occup Environ Med; 2019 Feb; 76(2):90-96. PubMed ID: 30563846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. STARS: strategies to assist navy recruits' success.
    Williams A; Hagerty BM; Andrei AC; Yousha SM; Hirth RA; Hoyle KS
    Mil Med; 2007 Sep; 172(9):942-9. PubMed ID: 17937357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Military Surgical Team Communication: Implications for Safety.
    Stucky CH; De Jong MJ; Kabo FW
    Mil Med; 2020 Mar; 185(3-4):e448-e456. PubMed ID: 31665390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender and trauma as predictors of military attrition: a study of Marine Corps recruits.
    Wolfe J; Turner K; Caulfield M; Newton TL; Melia K; Martin J; Goldstein J
    Mil Med; 2005 Dec; 170(12):1037-43. PubMed ID: 16491944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.
    Bass BM; Avolio BJ; Jung DI; Berson Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 12731705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interprofessional Healthcare Teams in the Military: A Scoping Literature Review.
    Varpio L; Bader KS; Meyer HS; Durning SJ; Artino AR; Hamwey MK
    Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e448-e454. PubMed ID: 29741728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender differences in subjective distress attributable to anticipation of combat among U.S. Army soldiers deployed to the Persian Gulf during Operation Desert Storm.
    Rosen LN; Wright K; Marlowe D; Bartone P; Gifford RK
    Mil Med; 1999 Nov; 164(11):753-7. PubMed ID: 10578583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training forward surgical teams for deployment: the US Army Trauma Training Center.
    Valdiri LA; Andrews-Arce VE; Seery JM
    Crit Care Nurse; 2015 Apr; 35(2):e11-7. PubMed ID: 25834016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why do they fail? A qualitative follow up study of 1000 recruits to the British Army Infantry to understand high levels of attrition.
    Kiernan MD; Repper J; Arthur A
    Work; 2015; 52(4):921-34. PubMed ID: 26599676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.