253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30395388)
1. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Elsoukkary SS; Soong L; Sweeney J; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 30395388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?
Richardson CJ; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31774630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value of 0.5 for atypical urothelial cells.
Hang JF; Charu V; Zhang ML; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):710-716. PubMed ID: 28581671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH.
Vlajnic T; Gut A; Savic S; Bubendorf L
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 73(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31467041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" and "positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" remain separate categories?
Nguyen L; Nilforoushan N; Krane JF; Bose S; Bakkar R
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Feb; 129(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33036060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up.
Khajir G; Sun T; Wang H; Sprenkle PC; Adeniran AJ; Cai G; Levi AW
Cytopathology; 2024 Mar; 35(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 37916579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.
Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC
Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.
Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR
Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of the Paris System in Urine Cytology for Improved Screening of High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma in Bahrain.
Mahmoud Daoud R; Ali AH; Salim Fredericks S; Daoud S; Gomaa HR; AlHashimi FS
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57189. PubMed ID: 38681345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology in the Performance of Urine Cytology: A Correlative Study of 124 Cases.
Hassan M; Solanki S; Kassouf W; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Auger M; Brimo F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 27543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One year of experience using the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Meilleroux J; Daniel G; Aziza J; d'Aure DM; Quintyn-Ranty ML; Basset CM; Evrard SM; Courtade-Saidi MM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Jun; 126(6):430-436. PubMed ID: 29663682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved correlation of urinary cytology specimens using The Paris System in biopsy-proven upper tract urothelial carcinomas.
McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Robinson BD; Rao RA; Goyal A; Heymann JJ; Siddiqui MT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Jul; 126(7):498-504. PubMed ID: 29927548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative cytomorphological comparison of SurePath and ThinPrep liquid-based cytology using high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells.
Okuda C; Kyotake A; Nakamura A; Itoh T; Kamoshida S; Ohsaki H
Cytopathology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):654-659. PubMed ID: 34033150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology improves diagnostic accuracy of selective upper urinary tract cytology.
Miyai K; Nakayama M; Minabe S; Ogata S; Ito K; Matsukuma S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 Apr; 132(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 38294961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytohistological correlation of urine cytology in a tertiary centre with application of the Paris system.
Rohilla M; Singh P; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Dey P; Kakkar N
Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 29920811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience on the use of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology: review of the published literature.
Pastorello RG; Barkan GA; Saieg M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 33160893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
Celik B; Kavas G
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved risk stratification for patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma following application of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Cowan ML; Rosenthal DL; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Jun; 125(6):427-434. PubMed ID: 28272842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Single-institutional Experience With Emphasis on Diagnostic Yield of High-grade Urothelial Carcinoma and Low-grade Urothelial Neoplasm.
Koh HH; Lee MJ; Park NJ; Kim HS; Oh YL
Anticancer Res; 2020 Jun; 40(6):3477-3484. PubMed ID: 32487647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical follow up and the impact of the Paris system in the assessment of patients with atypical urine cytology.
Northrup V; Acar BC; Hossain M; Acker MR; Manuel E; Rahmeh T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 30375194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
