154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30395725)
1. A Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model for Dyadic Interactions.
Rast P; Ferrer E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):756-775. PubMed ID: 30395725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects location scale model for learning.
Williams DR; Zimprich DR; Rast P
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):1968-1986. PubMed ID: 31069713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian Multivariate Mixed-Effects Location Scale Modeling of Longitudinal Relations Among Affective Traits, States, and Physical Activity.
Williams DR; Martin SR; Liu S; Rast P
Eur J Psychol Assess; 2020 Nov; 36(6):981-997. PubMed ID: 34764628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partitioning the Variability of Daily Emotion Dynamics in Dyadic Interactions with a Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model.
Ferrer E; Rast P
Curr Opin Behav Sci; 2017 Jun; 15():10-15. PubMed ID: 31681824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adult attachment, hostile conflict, and relationship adjustment among couples facing multiple sclerosis.
Crangle CJ; Hart TL
Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):836-853. PubMed ID: 28699702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analyzing Dyadic Data Using Grid-Sequence Analysis: Interdyad Differences in Intradyad Dynamics.
Brinberg M; Ram N; Hülür G; Brick TR; Gerstorf D
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Dec; 73(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 28034903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An application of a mixed-effects location scale model for analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data.
Hedeker D; Mermelstein RJ; Demirtas H
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):627-34. PubMed ID: 17970819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Power to Detect and Predict Individual Differences in Intra-Individual Variability Using the Mixed-Effects Location-Scale Model.
Walters RW; Hoffman L; Templin J
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):360-374. PubMed ID: 29565691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling Nonstationary Emotion Dynamics in Dyads using a Time-Varying Vector-Autoregressive Model.
Bringmann LF; Ferrer E; Hamaker EL; Borsboom D; Tuerlinckx F
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):293-314. PubMed ID: 29505311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian latent-class mixed-effect hybrid models for dyadic longitudinal data with non-ignorable dropouts.
Ahn J; Liu S; Wang W; Yuan Y
Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):914-24. PubMed ID: 24328715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.
Joel S; Eastwick PW; Allison CJ; Arriaga XB; Baker ZG; Bar-Kalifa E; Bergeron S; Birnbaum GE; Brock RL; Brumbaugh CC; Carmichael CL; Chen S; Clarke J; Cobb RJ; Coolsen MK; Davis J; de Jong DC; Debrot A; DeHaas EC; Derrick JL; Eller J; Estrada MJ; Faure R; Finkel EJ; Fraley RC; Gable SL; Gadassi-Polack R; Girme YU; Gordon AM; Gosnell CL; Hammond MD; Hannon PA; Harasymchuk C; Hofmann W; Horn AB; Impett EA; Jamieson JP; Keltner D; Kim JJ; Kirchner JL; Kluwer ES; Kumashiro M; Larson G; Lazarus G; Logan JM; Luchies LB; MacDonald G; Machia LV; Maniaci MR; Maxwell JA; Mizrahi M; Muise A; Niehuis S; Ogolsky BG; Oldham CR; Overall NC; Perrez M; Peters BJ; Pietromonaco PR; Powers SI; Prok T; Pshedetzky-Shochat R; Rafaeli E; Ramsdell EL; Reblin M; Reicherts M; Reifman A; Reis HT; Rhoades GK; Rholes WS; Righetti F; Rodriguez LM; Rogge R; Rosen NO; Saxbe D; Sened H; Simpson JA; Slotter EB; Stanley SM; Stocker S; Surra C; Ter Kuile H; Vaughn AA; Vicary AM; Visserman ML; Wolf S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Aug; 117(32):19061-19071. PubMed ID: 32719123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A general and flexible approach to estimating the social relations model using Bayesian methods.
Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Kenny DA; Trautwein U
Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):101-19. PubMed ID: 22799626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Dyadic IRT Model.
Gin B; Sim N; Skrondal A; Rabe-Hesketh S
Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):815-836. PubMed ID: 32856271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Latent Variable Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model with an Application to Daily Diary Data.
Blozis SA
Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1548-1570. PubMed ID: 35505127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling Individual Differences in Within-Person Variation of Negative and Positive Affect in a Mixed Effects Location Scale Model Using BUGS/JAGS.
Rast P; Hofer SM; Sparks C
Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Mar; 47(2):177-200. PubMed ID: 26734847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An idiographic approach to estimating models of dyadic interactions with differential equations.
Steele JS; Ferrer E; Nesselroade JR
Psychometrika; 2014 Oct; 79(4):675-700. PubMed ID: 24352513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling actor and partner effects in dyadic data when outcomes are categorical.
Loeys T; Molenberghs G
Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):220-36. PubMed ID: 23458720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coping in relationships: the interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction.
Herzberg PY
Anxiety Stress Coping; 2013 Mar; 26(2):136-53. PubMed ID: 22300303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the dyadic data analysis in behavioral medicine research: marital satisfaction and anxiety in infertile couples.
Maroufizadeh S; Hosseini M; Rahimi Foroushani A; Omani-Samani R; Amini P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 30367603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Maternal and Partner Sex During Pregnancy Scales (MSP/PSP) in Portugal: Assessing Dyadic Interdependence and Associations with Sexual Behaviors.
Tavares IM; Heiman JR; Rosen NO; Nobre PJ
J Sex Med; 2021 Apr; 18(4):789-799. PubMed ID: 33766522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
