167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30396640)
21. Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Gray-Scale Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
Lv Y; Chi X; Sun B; Lin S; Xing D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(3):405-412. PubMed ID: 32345804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer.
Wang X; Xu P; Wang Y; Grant EG
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 21498359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a retrospective study.
Ooi CC; Low SC; Schneider-Kolsky M; Lombardo P; Lim SY; Abu Bakar R; Lo RH
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Oct; 54(5):421-30. PubMed ID: 20958940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bolus compared with continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent using real-time contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound in breast tumors.
Saracco A; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Themudo R; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):854-9. PubMed ID: 19634024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Tumors.
Pan J; Chen W; Zhang H; Huang X; Huang X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):261-271. PubMed ID: 33153806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of region-of-interest size and location on quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound of canine splenic perfusion.
Morabito S; Di Pietro S; Cicero L; Falcone A; Liotta L; Crupi R; Cassata G; Macrì F
BMC Vet Res; 2021 Aug; 17(1):271. PubMed ID: 34380481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of region of interest (ROI) size on the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in differentiating solid breast lesions.
Moon JH; Hwang JY; Park JS; Koh SH; Park SY
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):657-663. PubMed ID: 28899126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?
Sorelli PG; Cosgrove DO; Svensson WE; Zaman N; Satchithananda K; Barrett NK; Lim AK
J Clin Ultrasound; 2010 May; 38(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 20146214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Wei SP; Xu CL; Zhang Q; Zhang QR; Zhao YE; Huang PF; Xie YD; Zhou CS; Tian FL; Yang B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 28331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Double-contrast-enhanced sonography for diagnosis of rectal lesions with pathologic correlation.
Lu M; Yan B; Song J; Ping W; Yue LX; Song B
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):575-83. PubMed ID: 24658937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The clinical value of Arrival-time Parametric Imaging using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.
Hu W; Dong Y; Zhang X; Zhang H; Li F; Bai M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 75(3):369-382. PubMed ID: 32280085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation and guiding biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a preliminary study.
Wang Y; Xu Z; Huang H; Zhou X; Xian M
Clin Radiol; 2020 Jan; 75(1):79.e19-79.e24. PubMed ID: 31706568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen.
von Herbay A; Barreiros AP; Ignee A; Westendorff J; Gregor M; Galle PR; Dietrich C
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Apr; 28(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 19321670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 317 patients.
von Herbay A; Westendorff J; Gregor M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2010 Jan; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19790253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Jiang YX; Liu H; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q; Chang XY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1873-81. PubMed ID: 17686569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Differential diagnosis of nonpalpable testicular lesions: qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced US of benign and malignant testicular tumors.
Isidori AM; Pozza C; Gianfrilli D; Giannetta E; Lemma A; Pofi R; Barbagallo F; Manganaro L; Martino G; Lombardo F; Cantisani V; Franco G; Lenzi A
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):606-18. PubMed ID: 24968192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Zhang B; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Yang M; Dai Q; Zhu QL; Gao P
Thyroid; 2010 Jan; 20(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20067379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differentiation of benign from malignant focal splenic lesions using sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography.
Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; von Seydewitz CU; Dahlke J; Malzfeldt E; Braumann D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):709-21. PubMed ID: 19696284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Du J; Wang L; Wan CF; Hua J; Fang H; Chen J; Li FH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3890-9. PubMed ID: 23062280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
