BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30396656)

  • 21. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
    Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distribution pattern of FDG uptake using ring-type dedicated breast PET in comparison to whole-body PET/CT scanning in invasive breast cancer.
    Sakaguchi R; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Sugie T; Toi M; Mikami Y; Togashi K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Aug; 33(8):570-578. PubMed ID: 31115856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
    Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
    Jung HK; Kuzmiak CM; Kim KW; Choi NM; Kim HJ; Langman EL; Yoon S; Steen D; Zeng D; Gao F
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
    Kawai M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Iima M; Onishi N; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A preliminary study to propose a diagnostic algorithm for PET/CT-detected incidental breast lesions: application of BI-RADS lexicon for US in combination with SUVmax.
    Bakhshayeshkaram M; Salehi Y; Abbasi M; Hashemi Beni R; Seifi S; Hassanzad M; Jamaati HR; Aghahosseini F
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5507-5516. PubMed ID: 30887201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Krug KB; Houbois C; Grinstein O; Borggrefe J; Puesken M; Hanstein B; Malter W; Maintz D; Hellmich M
    Rofo; 2017 Oct; 189(10):977-989. PubMed ID: 28683503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship between ring-type dedicated breast PET and immune microenvironment in early breast cancer.
    Sasada S; Shiroma N; Goda N; Kajitani K; Emi A; Masumoto N; Kadoya T; Arihiro K; Okada M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Oct; 177(3):651-657. PubMed ID: 31267329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of radioactivity outside the field of view on image quality of dedicated breast positron emission tomography: preliminary phantom and clinical studies.
    Satoh Y; Imai M; Ikegawa C; Hirata K; Abo N; Kusuzaki M; Oyama-Manabe N; Onishi H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Dec; 36(12):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 36207497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance evaluation of a high resolution dedicated breast PET scanner.
    García Hernández T; Vicedo González A; Ferrer Rebolleda J; Sánchez Jurado R; Roselló Ferrando J; Brualla González L; Granero Cabañero D; Del Puig Cozar Santiago M
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2261. PubMed ID: 27147338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes.
    Benndorf M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 20707656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion MR Imaging: Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Several Markers of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
    Iima M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Onishi N; Kawai M; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 29095673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication.
    Chikarmane SA; Tai R; Meyer JE; Giess CS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 27955878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome.
    Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?
    Li LJ; Yao JY; Zhou XC; Zhao XB; Zhong WJ; Ou B; Luo BM; Hao SY; Zhi H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 28256344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience.
    Rosen EL; Turkington TG; Soo MS; Baker JA; Coleman RE
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):527-34. PubMed ID: 15671006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management.
    Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL; Poole PS; Sippo DA; Giess CS
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):707-15. PubMed ID: 27089027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.