These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30396664)

  • 1. Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility in brain tumors measured on 1.5 and 3 T clinical scanners: A pilot study.
    Merhemic Z; Imsirovic B; Bilalovic N; Stojanov D; Boban J; Thurnher MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():249-253. PubMed ID: 30396664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apparent diffusion coefficient normalization of normal liver: Will it improve the reproducibility of diffusion-weighted imaging at different MR scanners as a new biomarker?
    Zhu J; Zhang J; Gao JY; Li JN; Yang DW; Chen M; Zhou C; Yang ZH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(3):e5910. PubMed ID: 28099354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility of the pancreas measured at different MR scanners using diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Ye XH; Gao JY; Yang ZH; Liu Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 40(6):1375-81. PubMed ID: 24222019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.
    Grech-Sollars M; Hales PW; Miyazaki K; Raschke F; Rodriguez D; Wilson M; Gill SK; Banks T; Saunders DE; Clayden JD; Gwilliam MN; Barrick TR; Morgan PS; Davies NP; Rossiter J; Auer DP; Grundy R; Leach MO; Howe FA; Peet AC; Clark CA
    NMR Biomed; 2015 Apr; 28(4):468-85. PubMed ID: 25802212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Belli G; Busoni S; Ciccarone A; Coniglio A; Esposito M; Giannelli M; Mazzoni LN; Nocetti L; Sghedoni R; Tarducci R; Zatelli G; Anoja RA; Belmonte G; Bertolino N; Betti M; Biagini C; Ciarmatori A; Cretti F; Fabbri E; Fedeli L; Filice S; Fulcheri CP; Gasperi C; Mangili PA; Mazzocchi S; Meliadò G; Morzenti S; Noferini L; Oberhofer N; Orsingher L; Paruccini N; Princigalli G; Quattrocchi M; Rinaldi A; Scelfo D; Freixas GV; Tenori L; Zucca I; Luchinat C; Gori C; Gobbi G;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 26013043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement on diffusion gradient direction and spatial position - A quality assurance intercomparison study of forty-four scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Fedeli L; Belli G; Ciccarone A; Coniglio A; Esposito M; Giannelli M; Mazzoni LN; Nocetti L; Sghedoni R; Tarducci R; Altabella L; Belligotti E; Benelli M; Betti M; Caivano R; Carni' M; Chiappiniello A; Cimolai S; Cretti F; Fulcheri C; Gasperi C; Giacometti M; Levrero F; Lizio D; Maieron M; Marzi S; Mascaro L; Mazzocchi S; Meliado' G; Morzenti S; Noferini L; Oberhofer N; Quattrocchi MG; Ricci A; Taddeucci A; Tenori L; Luchinat C; Gobbi G; Gori C; Busoni S;
    Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():135-141. PubMed ID: 30342982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.
    Server A; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Josefsen R; Schellhorn T; Kumar T; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 19449234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.
    Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom study.
    Kıvrak AS; Paksoy Y; Erol C; Koplay M; Özbek S; Kara F
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 24004973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between-Scanner and Between-Visit Variation in Normal White Matter Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Setting of a Multi-Center Clinical Trial.
    Huo J; Alger J; Kim H; Brown M; Okada K; Pope W; Goldin J
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 26(4):423-430. PubMed ID: 25791203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy on a compact 3T MRI scanner using gradient nonlinearity correction.
    Tao AT; Shu Y; Tan ET; Trzasko JD; Tao S; Reid RD; Weavers PT; Huston J; Bernstein MA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1498-1507. PubMed ID: 30255963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative differential diagnosis between embryonal and ependymal tumors at 3 T MRI.
    Takayasu T; Yamasaki F; Akiyama Y; Ohtaki M; Saito T; Nosaka R; Takano M; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():136-143. PubMed ID: 29571787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Is Not Dependent on Magnetic Resonance Systems and Field Strength Under Fixed Imaging Parameters in Brain.
    Ogura A; Tamura T; Ozaki M; Doi T; Fujimoto K; Miyati T; Ito Y; Maeda F; Tarewaki H; Takahashi M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(5):760-5. PubMed ID: 26017920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative comparison of MR diffusion-weighted imaging for liver focal lesions between 3.0T and 1.5T: Regions of interest of the minimum-spot ADC, the largest possible solid part, and the maximum diameter in lesions.
    Tang Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Li J; Jia R; Ma L; Ye H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1320-1329. PubMed ID: 27080350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
    Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in normal prostate peripheral zone at 1.5T MRI.
    Hoang-Dinh A; Nguyen-Quang T; Bui-Van L; Gonindard-Melodelima C; Souchon R; Rouvière O
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2022 Nov; 103(11):545-554. PubMed ID: 35773099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve at 3.0 T using different MR scanners: agreement of FA and ADC measurements.
    Guggenberger R; Nanz D; Bussmann L; Chhabra A; Fischer MA; Hodler J; Pfirrmann CW; Andreisek G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e590-6. PubMed ID: 23768611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of diffusion measurements obtained on a 0.35T MR in Malawi: Important insights for radiologists in low income settings with low field MRI.
    Zhuang Y; Potchen MJ; Kampondeni SD; Tivarus M; Birbeck GL; Zhong J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45():120-128. PubMed ID: 29031584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pilot study on evaluation of any correlation between MR perfusion (Ktrans) and diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient) parameters in brain tumors at 3 Tesla.
    Chu JP; Mak HK; Yau KK; Zhang L; Tsang J; Chan Q; Ka-Kit Leung G
    Cancer Imaging; 2012 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22275724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interimager variability in ADC measurement of the human brain.
    Tsujita N; Kai N; Fujita Y; Hiai Y; Hirai T; Kitajima M; Yamashita Y; Murakami R
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2014; 13(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 24769632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.