695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30396817)
1. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.
Yeap MC; Tu PH; Liu ZH; Hsieh PC; Liu YT; Lee CY; Lai HY; Chen CT; Huang YC; Wei KC; Wu CT; Chen CC
World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e841-e850. PubMed ID: 31082551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.
Fan MC; Wang QL; Sun P; Zhan SH; Guo P; Deng WS; Dong Q
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e853-e859. PubMed ID: 29107719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Customised Cranioplasty Implant for Decompressive Craniectomy Patients ? A Technical Note.
Mohammad K
Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(1):148-150. PubMed ID: 28481392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption.
Ernst G; Qeadan F; Carlson AP
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(6):1604-1610. PubMed ID: 29303450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term follow-up of cryopreservation with glycerol of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Takeuchi H; Higashino Y; Hosoda T; Yamada S; Arishima H; Kodera T; Kitai R; Kikuta K
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Mar; 158(3):571-5. PubMed ID: 26733129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Klieverik VM; Miller KJ; Han KS; Singhal A; Vassilyadi M; Touchette CJ; Weil AG; Woerdeman PA
Childs Nerv Syst; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30554262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cranial reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy: prediction of complications using fuzzy logic.
Godil SS; Shamim MS; Enam SA; Qidwai U; Qadeer M; Sobani ZA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1307-11. PubMed ID: 21772193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts.
Kriegel RJ; Schaller C; Clusmann H
Zentralbl Neurochir; 2007 Nov; 68(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17966077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decompressive hemicraniectomy and cranioplasty using subcutaneously preserved autologous bone flaps versus synthetic implants: perioperative outcomes and cost analysis.
Dowlati E; Pasko KBD; Molina EA; Felbaum DR; Mason RB; Mai JC; Nair MN; Aulisi EF; Armonda RA
J Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 137(6):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 35535843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.
Sundseth J; Sundseth A; Berg-Johnsen J; Sorteberg W; Lindegaard KF
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Apr; 156(4):805-11; discussion 811. PubMed ID: 24493001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of implant material and patient age on the long-term outcome of secondary cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury.
Hamböck M; Hosmann A; Seemann R; Wolf H; Schachinger F; Hajdu S; Widhalm H
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Apr; 162(4):745-753. PubMed ID: 32025876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autologous and acrylic cranioplasty: a review of 10 years and 258 cases.
Klinger DR; Madden C; Beshay J; White J; Gambrell K; Rickert K
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(3-4):e525-30. PubMed ID: 24036124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications?
Wachter D; Reineke K; Behm T; Rohde V
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 Aug; 115(8):1293-7. PubMed ID: 23273384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications of skull reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy.
Herteleer M; Ectors N; Duflou J; Van Calenbergh F
Acta Chir Belg; 2017 Jun; 117(3):149-156. PubMed ID: 27931166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of systematic scalp expansion before cranioplasty in patients with craniectomy defects.
Merlino G; Carlucci S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26189142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of Surgical Site Infection in Autologous Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Subcutaneously Preserved Bone Flaps in Abdominal Pockets.
Alkhaibary A; Alharbi A; Abbas M; Algarni A; Abdullah JM; Almadani WH; Khairy I; Alkhani A; Aloraidi A; Khairy S
World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e627-e632. PubMed ID: 31568916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
