107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30396982)
1. Aggressive Cancer Behavior of Latent Gleason Pattern 5 in Prostatectomy Specimens.
Fujimura T; Fukuhara H; Yamada Y; Taguchi S; Sugihara T; Niimi A; Nakamura M; Nakagawa T; Igawa Y; Homma Y; Kume H
Anticancer Res; 2018 Nov; 38(11):6529-6535. PubMed ID: 30396982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Adam M; Hannah A; Budäus L; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Haese A; Fisch M; Wittmer C; Steurer S; Minner S; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Sauter G; Schlomm T; Isbarn H
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 24518778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor necrosis in radical prostatectomies with high-grade prostate cancer is associated with multiple poor prognostic features and a high prevalence of residual disease.
Acosta AM; Al Rasheed MRH; Rauscher GH; Vormittag E; Mon KS; Sharif A; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Mohapatra G
Hum Pathol; 2018 May; 75():1-9. PubMed ID: 29180249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Nagao G; Nakagami Y; Ohno Y; Horiguchi Y; Namiki K; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 25339062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases.
Kates M; Sopko NA; Han M; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 26264998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Yang R; Cao K; Han T; Zhang YF; Zhang GT; Xu LF; Lian HB; Li XG; Guo HQ
Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 27004537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Beauval JB; Ploussard G; Cabarrou B; Roumiguié M; Ouzzane A; Gas J; Goujon A; Marcq G; Mathieu R; Vincendeau S; Cathelineau X; Mongiat-Artus P; Salomon L; Soulié M; Méjean A; de La Taille A; Rouprêt M; Rozet F;
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1191-1197. PubMed ID: 27987030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can perineural invasion detected in prostate needle biopsy specimens predict surgical margin positivity in D'Amico low risk patients?
Haki Yuksel O; Urkmez A; Verit A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Jul; 88(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 27377081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Sim J; Breau RH; Morash C; Belanger EC; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2018 Feb; 472(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 28975495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer: correlation with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Patel U; Dasgupta P; Challacombe B; Cahill D; Brown C; Patel R; Kirby R
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27153933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
