BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30396982)

  • 21. Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence.
    Cole AI; Morgan TM; Spratt DE; Palapattu GS; He C; Tomlins SA; Weizer AZ; Feng FY; Wu A; Siddiqui J; Chinnaiyan AM; Montgomery JS; Kunju LP; Miller DC; Hollenbeck BK; Wei JT; Mehra R
    J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):405-11. PubMed ID: 26920466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic Significance of the Disparity Between Biopsy and Pathologic Gleason Score After Radical Prostatectomy in Clinical Candidates for Active Surveillance According to the Royal Marsden Criteria.
    Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S; Oh JJ
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2016 Aug; 14(4):e329-33. PubMed ID: 26935997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
    Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Existence of pattern 5 on radical prostatectomy: poor prognostic factor associated with a lower biochemical recurrence-free survival].
    Pastori J; Balssa L; Lillaz J; Guichard G; Chabannes E; Bernardini S; Bittard H; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Kleinclauss F
    Prog Urol; 2014 Jun; 24(7):433-40. PubMed ID: 24861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
    Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk Stratification of pN+ Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy from a Large Single Institutional Series with Long-Term Followup.
    Moschini M; Sharma V; Zattoni F; Boorjian SA; Frank I; Gettman MT; Thompson RH; Tollefson MK; Kwon ED; Karnes RJ
    J Urol; 2016 Jun; 195(6):1773-8. PubMed ID: 26723866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clonal relationships of adjacent Gleason pattern 3 and Gleason pattern 5 lesions in Gleason Scores 3+5=8 and 5+3=8.
    Bakbak H; Sayar E; Kaur HB; Salles DC; Patel RA; Hicks J; Lotan TL; De Marzo AM; Gulati R; Epstein JI; Haffner MC
    Hum Pathol; 2022 Dec; 130():18-24. PubMed ID: 36309296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tumour growth fraction measured by immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 is an independent prognostic factor in preoperative prostate biopsies with small-volume or low-grade prostate cancer.
    Zellweger T; Günther S; Zlobec I; Savic S; Sauter G; Moch H; Mattarelli G; Eichenberger T; Curschellas E; Rüfenacht H; Bachmann A; Gasser TC; Mihatsch MJ; Bubendorf L
    Int J Cancer; 2009 May; 124(9):2116-23. PubMed ID: 19117060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.