These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30397280)

  • 21. Encapsulated contrast microbubble radial oscillation associated with postexcitation pressure peaks.
    Santin MD; King DA; Foiret J; Haak A; O'Brien WD; Bridal SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1156-64. PubMed ID: 20136236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.
    Chomas JE; Dayton P; Allen J; Morgan K; Ferrara KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jan; 48(1):232-48. PubMed ID: 11367791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterisation of Liposome-Loaded Microbubble Populations for Subharmonic Imaging.
    McLaughlan JR; Harput S; Abou-Saleh RH; Peyman SA; Evans S; Freear S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):346-356. PubMed ID: 27789045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
    Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultrasonically induced dynamics of a contrast agent microbubble between two parallel elastic walls.
    Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6797-814. PubMed ID: 24018966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
    Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy optimization of low frequency microbubble-mediated sonoporation as a drug delivery platform to cancer cells.
    Eck M; Aronovich R; Ilovitsh T
    Int J Pharm X; 2022 Dec; 4():100132. PubMed ID: 36189459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles.
    Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():67-74. PubMed ID: 25620709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In-situ synchrotron X-ray imaging of ultrasound (US)-generated bubbles: Influence of US frequency on microbubble cavitation for membrane fouling remediation.
    Ehsani M; Zhu N; Doan H; Lohi A; Abdelrasoul A
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2021 Sep; 77():105697. PubMed ID: 34388491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lipid microbubbles as a vehicle for targeted drug delivery using focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.
    Sierra C; Acosta C; Chen C; Wu SY; Karakatsani ME; Bernal M; Konofagou EE
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2017 Apr; 37(4):1236-1250. PubMed ID: 27278929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating the Role of Lipid Transfer in Microbubble-Mediated Drug Delivery.
    Aron M; Vince O; Gray M; Mannaris C; Stride E
    Langmuir; 2019 Oct; 35(40):13205-13215. PubMed ID: 31517490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional transcranial microbubble imaging for guiding volumetric ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.
    Jones RM; Deng L; Leung K; McMahon D; O'Reilly MA; Hynynen K
    Theranostics; 2018; 8(11):2909-2926. PubMed ID: 29896293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the microbubble shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the brain.
    Wu SY; Chen CC; Tung YS; Olumolade OO; Konofagou EE
    J Control Release; 2015 Aug; 212():30-40. PubMed ID: 26065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
    Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effects of Oxygen on Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Mice.
    McDannold N; Zhang Y; Vykhodtseva N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):469-475. PubMed ID: 27789044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamics of a contrast agent microbubble attached to an elastic wall.
    Doinikov AA; Aired L; Bouakaz A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 22067267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of ultrasound on adherent microbubble contrast agents.
    Loughran J; Sennoga C; J Eckersley R; Tang MX
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6999-7014. PubMed ID: 23044731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Closed-loop control of targeted ultrasound drug delivery across the blood-brain/tumor barriers in a rat glioma model.
    Sun T; Zhang Y; Power C; Alexander PM; Sutton JT; Aryal M; Vykhodtseva N; Miller EL; McDannold NJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):E10281-E10290. PubMed ID: 29133392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CMUT for ultrafast passive cavitation detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption: proof of concept study.
    Cornu C; Jourdain L; Barcella F; Colin L; Edon Z; Dauba A; Selingue E; Gennisson JL; Larrat B; Certon D; Novell A
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Oct; 69(20):. PubMed ID: 39362276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of ultrasound induced cavitation on magnetic resonance imaging contrast in the rat liver in the presence of macromolecular contrast agent.
    Frulio N; Trillaud H; Deckers R; Lepreux S; Moonen C; Quesson B
    Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 20375844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.