These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3039750)

  • 1. [The interface between hydroxyapatite ceramic and newly formed bone in scanning electron microscopy].
    Brill W; Katthagen BD
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1987; 125(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 3039750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile strength of the interface between hydroxyapatite and bone.
    Hong L; Xu HC; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Jan; 26(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1315777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interface mechanics and histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and porous glass-ceramic implants in canine bone.
    Nimb L; Jensen JS; Gotfredsen K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 8600137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biocompatibility of zirconia dispersed hydroxyapatite ceramics.
    Suzuki O; Suda A; Sato T; Takagi M; Osanai T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 64(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 2166117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in ceramic-bone interface between surface-active ceramics and resorbable ceramics: a study by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Fujita Y; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Bando Y; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Feb; 26(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 1569117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new glass-ceramic for bone replacement: evaluation of its bonding to bone tissue.
    Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Higashi S; Kokubo T; Itoo S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(6):685-98. PubMed ID: 3001094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite ceramic: a study of retrieved human middle ear implants.
    van Blitterswijk CA; Hesseling SC; Grote JJ; Koerten HK; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Apr; 24(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 2161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of glass-ceramic bone implant materials on the in vitro formation of hydroxyapatite.
    Blumenthal NC; Posner AS; Cosma V; Gross U
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Nov; 22(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 2853711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The effect of fibrin glue on the healing of hydroxyapatite ceramics. An animal experiment study].
    Reck R; Bernal-Sprekelsen M
    HNO; 1989 Mar; 37(3):112-6. PubMed ID: 2468630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface.
    Jarcho M; Kay JF; Gumaer KI; Doremus RH; Drobeck HP
    J Bioeng; 1977 Jan; 1(2):79-92. PubMed ID: 355244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone attachment to hydroxyapatite coated polymers.
    Boone PS; Zimmerman MC; Gutteling E; Lee CK; Parsons JR; Langrana N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Aug; 23(A2 Suppl):183-99. PubMed ID: 2674147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No effect of hydroxyapatite particles in phagocytosable sizes on implant fixation: an experimental study in dogs.
    Rahbek O; Kold S; Bendix K; Overgaard S; Soballe K
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 May; 73(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 15754330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mineralization and calcium fixation within a porous apatitic ceramic material after implantation in the femur of rabbits.
    Krajewski A; Ravaglioli A; Mongiorgi R; Moroni A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Jun; 22(6):445-57. PubMed ID: 2842343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histochemical and laser scanning microscopy characterization of the hydroxyapatite-bone interface: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Piattelli A; Piattelli M; Romasco N; Trisi P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8206551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interface of calcium-phosphate and glass-ceramic in bone, a structural analysis.
    Gross UM; Müller-Mai CM; Voigt C
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11():83-5. PubMed ID: 2397266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strengthening of bone-implant interface by the use of granule coatings on alumina ceramics.
    Kakutani Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kotoura Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jul; 23(7):781-808. PubMed ID: 2738088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Nakamura T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Yamamuro T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):999-1006. PubMed ID: 8408128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of aging on the healing of hydroxylapatite implants.
    Shirota T; Ohno K; Suzuki K; Michi K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Jan; 51(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 8380447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.