These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30397723)

  • 1. [The health economics of cancer screening in Germany: Which population-based interventions are cost-effective?].
    Schlander M; Cheng CY; Ran T
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Dec; 61(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 30397723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data.
    Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Matsuda T; Matsumoto M; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Kakugawa Y; Yamamoto S; Saito H; Saito Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 26685321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colon Cancer Screening - Is It Time Yet?
    Bhurgri H; Samiullah S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jun; 27(6):327-328. PubMed ID: 28689518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer.
    Pil L; Fobelets M; Putman K; Trybou J; Annemans L
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 32():72-8. PubMed ID: 27157827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.
    Meenan RT; Anderson ML; Chubak J; Vernon SW; Fuller S; Wang CY; Green BB
    Am J Prev Med; 2015 Jun; 48(6):714-21. PubMed ID: 25998922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: a microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting.
    Treskova M; Aumann I; Golpon H; Vogel-Claussen J; Welte T; Kuhlmann A
    BMC Med; 2017 Aug; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 28838313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and economic impact of screening for colorectal cancer by mass fecal occult blood testing.
    Helm JF; Russo MW; Biddle AK; Simpson KN; Ransohoff DF; Sandler RS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Nov; 95(11):3250-8. PubMed ID: 11095350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
    Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
    Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions with Their Effects on Health Disparity Being Considered.
    Lee KS; Park EC
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 48(3):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26727714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.