These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30399083)

  • 1. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience.
    Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of the First U.S. FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device at 10-Year Follow-up.
    Su EP; Ho H; Bhal V; Housman LR; Masonis JL; Noble JW; Hopper RH; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(14):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33999875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The outcome and survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients aged less than 50 years: a prospective observational cohort study with minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Scholes CJ; Ebrahimi M; Farah SB; Field C; Cordingley R; Kerr D; Kohan L
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 30601056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.
    Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.
    Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis - a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Bourget-Murray J; Watt Kearns SJ; Piroozfar S; Lukenchuk J; Johnston K; Werle J
    Can J Surg; 2022; 65(3):E296-E302. PubMed ID: 35504661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively.
    Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
    Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.
    Uemura K; Takao M; Hamada H; Sakai T; Ohzono K; Sugano N
    J Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 21(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28856453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States.
    Nam D; Nunley RM; Ruh EL; Engh CA; Rogerson JS; Brooks PJ; Raterman SJ; Su EP; Barrack RL
    Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):e715-21. PubMed ID: 26270759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
    Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP
    Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component.
    Adelani MA; Mall NA; Nyazee H; Clohisy JC; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 24951737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cementless metaphyseal fitting anatomic total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients thirty years of age or younger.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):1570-5. PubMed ID: 22992847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
    Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.