368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30400818)
1. Combining accurate tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection.
Lee AY; Ewing AD; Ellrott K; Hu Y; Houlahan KE; Bare JC; Espiritu SMG; Huang V; Dang K; Chong Z; Caloian C; Yamaguchi TN; ; Kellen MR; Chen K; Norman TC; Friend SH; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; Haussler D; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
Genome Biol; 2018 Nov; 19(1):188. PubMed ID: 30400818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection.
Ewing AD; Houlahan KE; Hu Y; Ellrott K; Caloian C; Yamaguchi TN; Bare JC; P'ng C; Waggott D; Sabelnykova VY; ; Kellen MR; Norman TC; Haussler D; Friend SH; Stolovitzky G; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
Nat Methods; 2015 Jul; 12(7):623-30. PubMed ID: 25984700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Germline contamination and leakage in whole genome somatic single nucleotide variant detection.
Sendorek DH; Caloian C; Ellrott K; Bare JC; Yamaguchi TN; Ewing AD; Houlahan KE; Norman TC; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 29385983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrated approach to generate artificial samples with low tumor fraction for somatic variant calling benchmarking.
Sergi A; Beltrame L; Marchini S; Masseroli M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 25(1):180. PubMed ID: 38720249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SomatoSim: precision simulation of somatic single nucleotide variants.
Hawari MA; Hong CS; Biesecker LG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):109. PubMed ID: 33676403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SMaSH: a benchmarking toolkit for human genome variant calling.
Talwalkar A; Liptrap J; Newcomb J; Hartl C; Terhorst J; Curtis K; Bresler M; Song YS; Jordan MI; Patterson D
Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2787-95. PubMed ID: 24894505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving somatic exome sequencing performance by biological replicates.
Cebeci YE; Erturk RA; Ergun MA; Baysan M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):124. PubMed ID: 38519906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging long read sequencing from a single individual to provide a comprehensive resource for benchmarking variant calling methods.
Mu JC; Tootoonchi Afshar P; Mohiyuddin M; Chen X; Li J; Bani Asadi N; Gerstein MB; Wong WH; Lam HY
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14493. PubMed ID: 26412485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural Variant Breakpoint Detection with novoBreak.
Chong Z; Chen K
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():129-141. PubMed ID: 30039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural Variant Detection from Long-Read Sequencing Data with cuteSV.
Jiang T; Liu S; Cao S; Wang Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():137-151. PubMed ID: 35751813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GenomeVIP: a cloud platform for genomic variant discovery and interpretation.
Mashl RJ; Scott AD; Huang KL; Wyczalkowski MA; Yoon CJ; Niu B; DeNardo E; Yellapantula VD; Handsaker RE; Chen K; Koboldt DC; Ye K; Fenyö D; Raphael BJ; Wendl MC; Ding L
Genome Res; 2017 Aug; 27(8):1450-1459. PubMed ID: 28522612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking workflows to assess performance and suitability of germline variant calling pipelines in clinical diagnostic assays.
Krishnan V; Utiramerur S; Ng Z; Datta S; Snyder MP; Ashley EA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 33627090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software.
Cameron DL; Di Stefano L; Papenfuss AT
Nat Commun; 2019 Jul; 10(1):3240. PubMed ID: 31324872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of oncogenic and clinically actionable mutations in cancer genomes critically depends on variant calling tools.
Garcia-Prieto CA; Martínez-Jiménez F; Valencia A; Porta-Pardo E
Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(12):3181-3191. PubMed ID: 35512388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A database of simulated tumor genomes towards accurate detection of somatic small variants in cancer.
Meng J; Chen YP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202982. PubMed ID: 30161165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PerSVade: personalized structural variant detection in any species of interest.
Schikora-Tamarit MÀ; Gabaldón T
Genome Biol; 2022 Aug; 23(1):175. PubMed ID: 35974382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CrowdVariant: a crowdsourcing approach to classify copy number variants.
Greenside P; Zook J; Salit M; Cule M; Poplin R; DePristo M
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2019; 24():224-235. PubMed ID: 30864325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FIREVAT: finding reliable variants without artifacts in human cancer samples using etiologically relevant mutational signatures.
Kim H; Lee AJ; Lee J; Chun H; Ju YS; Hong D
Genome Med; 2019 Dec; 11(1):81. PubMed ID: 31847917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. novoBreak: local assembly for breakpoint detection in cancer genomes.
Chong Z; Ruan J; Gao M; Zhou W; Chen T; Fan X; Ding L; Lee AY; Boutros P; Chen J; Chen K
Nat Methods; 2017 Jan; 14(1):65-67. PubMed ID: 27892959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
